Comparison between multiparameter flow cytometry and WT1-RNA quantification in monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia without specific molecular targets.

Despite a high remission rate, a significant number of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse. Thus, the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in AML is an important strategy to better identify high risk patients. Most sensitive methodology to detect MRD is molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) but its applicability is restricted to AML with leukemia-specific molecular targets (e.g. AML1-ETO, CBFB-MYH11, MLL, FLT-3). In our study, MRD was monitored at different time points with both MFC and WT1-RNA quantification in 23 AML patients who did not present specific molecular targets. As previously published, we considered values of 10(-3) (0.1%) in MFC and 90 WT1-RNA × 10(4) ABL copies as optimal thresholds. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to confirm these data. To realize the methodology that better identify high risk patients, an analysis of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV) and likelihood ratio (LR) was provided and similar results were showed. MRD levels ≥ 10(-3) in MFC as well MRD levels ≥ 90 WT1-RNA copies in RQ-PCR, identify risk groups of patients with poor prognosis. Therefore, MFC and WT1-RNA quantification showed a comparable capacity in terms of technical performance and clinical significance to identify high risk patients who eventually relapsed.

[1]  K. Tobal,et al.  Prognostic significance of quantitative analysis of WT1 gene transcripts by competitive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in acute leukaemia , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[2]  E. Kjeldsen,et al.  WT1 gene expression: an excellent tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in 70% of acute myeloid leukaemia patients – results from a single‐centre study , 2004, British journal of haematology.

[3]  D. Strunk,et al.  RT-PCR and FISH analysis of acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;16)(p11;p13) and chimeric MOZ and CBP transcripts: breakpoint cluster region and clinical implications , 2004, Leukemia.

[4]  F. Lo‐Coco,et al.  Early prediction of treatment outcome in acute myeloid leukemia by measurement of WT1 transcript levels in peripheral blood samples collected after chemotherapy , 2008, Haematologica.

[5]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Determination of relapse risk based on assessment of minimal residual disease during complete remission by multiparameter flow cytometry in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 2004, Blood.

[6]  A. Venditti,et al.  Level of minimal residual disease after consolidation therapy predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2000, Blood.

[7]  A. Órfão,et al.  Early immunophenotypical evaluation of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia identifies different patient risk groups and may contribute to postinduction treatment stratification. , 2001, Blood.

[8]  I. Lewis,et al.  The use of receiver operating characteristic analysis for detection of minimal residual disease using five‐color multiparameter flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia identifies patients with high risk of relapse , 2009, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[9]  J. Downing,et al.  Clinical significance of residual disease during treatment in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[10]  V. V. D. van der Velden,et al.  Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of minimal residual disease by standardized WT1 assay to enhance risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  F. Lo‐Coco,et al.  The kinetics of reduction of minimal residual disease impacts on duration of response and survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia , 2006, Leukemia.

[12]  Marcos González,et al.  Immunophenotyping investigation of minimal residual disease is a useful approach for predicting relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients , 1997 .

[13]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G. Heinze,et al.  Detection of the WT1 transcript by RT-PCR in complete remission has no prognostic relevance in de novo acute myeloid leukemia , 1998, Leukemia.

[15]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  New score predicting for prognosis in PML-RARA+, AML1-ETO+, or CBFBMYH11+ acute myeloid leukemia based on quantification of fusion transcripts. , 2003, Blood.

[16]  S. Langabeer,et al.  Minimal residual disease detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia by reverse-transcriptase PCR: evaluation of PML-RAR alpha and RAR alpha-PML assessment in patients who ultimately relapse. , 1996, Leukemia.

[17]  A. Venditti,et al.  Clinical relevance of minimal residual disease detection in adult acute myeloid leukemia. , 2002, Journal of hematotherapy & stem cell research.

[18]  N. Nadal,et al.  Multiparametric analysis of normal and postchemotherapy bone marrow: Implication for the detection of leukemia‐associated immunophenotypes , 2008, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[19]  D. Cilloni,et al.  Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) in CBFbeta/MYH11-positive acute myeloid leukemias by qualitative and quantitative RT-PCR amplification of fusion transcripts , 2002, Leukemia.

[20]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Prognostic impact of RT-PCR-based quantification of WT1 gene expression during MRD monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia , 2005, Leukemia.

[21]  N. Hosen,et al.  The usefulness of monitoring WT1 gene transcripts for the prediction and management of relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute type leukemia. , 2003, Blood.

[22]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. , 2009, Blood.

[23]  D. Campana,et al.  Minimal residual disease monitoring by flow cytometry. , 2003, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[24]  B. Löwenberg Post-remission treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  D. Cilloni,et al.  Quantitative assessment of WT1 expression by real time quantitative PCR may be a useful tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute leukemia patients , 2002, Leukemia.

[26]  G. Heinze,et al.  Prognostic significance of WT1 gene expression at diagnosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia , 1997, Leukemia.

[27]  David Gillis,et al.  Incidence, sensitivity, and specificity of leukemia-associated phenotypes in acute myeloid leukemia using specific five-color multiparameter flow cytometry. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  R. Mayer,et al.  Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.