Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model.

Procedural justice research has documented many positive consequences of fair decision-making procedures and treatment by authorities. However, it is unclear why these effects of procedural justice occur. The group-value model proposes that fair procedures matter because they communicate two symbolic messages about group membership:(a) whether individuals are respected members of a group and (b) whether they should feel pride in the group as a whole. These messages are conveyed by 3 relational aspects ofthe actions ofauthorities-actions that indicate neutrality, trustworthiness, and status recognition. Results from 4 different studies provide evidence that:(a) relational aspects of fair procedures communicate group-relevant information, and (b) this information mediates the influence of procedural judgments on group-oriented behaviors and feelings of self-esteem.

[1]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[2]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[3]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  New Directions in Organizational Behavior , 1976 .

[4]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  An Attribution Theory of Leadership , 1977 .

[5]  Henry A. Landsberger,et al.  Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View , 1978 .

[6]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[7]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Law and Society Review , 1979 .

[8]  William Goodrich Dillman, Don. Mail and Telephone Surveys-the Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978 , 1979 .

[9]  M. Rosenberg Conceiving the self , 1979 .

[10]  E. Lind,et al.  Procedure and Outcome Effects on Reactions to Adjudicated Resolution of Conflicts of Interest , 1980 .

[11]  J. Pfeffer Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[12]  T. Tyler,et al.  The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. , 1981 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Process Analysis , 1981 .

[14]  J. P. Near,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS , 1983 .

[15]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments1 , 1983 .

[16]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[17]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants' Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience , 1984 .

[18]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Influence of Perceived Injustice on the Endorsement of Political Leaders1 , 1985 .

[19]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. , 1985 .

[20]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[21]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[22]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization , 1986 .

[23]  T. Tyler,et al.  Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. , 1986 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[26]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[27]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior , 1987 .

[28]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? , 1987 .

[29]  Awakening the Sense of Injustice , 1988 .

[30]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Social identification and permeability of group boundaries , 1988 .

[31]  D. Organ Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[32]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[33]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[34]  T. Tyler The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. , 1989 .

[35]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[36]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[37]  J. Crocker,et al.  Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. , 1990 .

[38]  P. Earley,et al.  Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments , 1990 .

[39]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[40]  Rupert Barnes Nacoste Sources of Stigma: Analyzing the Psychology of Affirmative Action , 1990 .

[41]  Philip M. Podsakoff,et al.  Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope versus Satisfaction , 1990 .

[42]  Robert H. Moorman,et al.  Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship ? , 1991 .

[43]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance , 1991 .

[44]  C. E. Joubert Self-Esteem and Social Desirability in Relation to College Students' Retrospective Perceptions of Parental Fairness and Disciplinary Practices , 1991, Psychological reports.

[45]  Robert Folger,et al.  The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims' layoff reactions. , 1991 .

[46]  M. Schaller,et al.  Intergroup Biases and the Cognitive Dynamics of Stereotype Formation , 1991 .

[47]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. , 1991 .

[48]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[49]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Procedural Justice and Culture , 1992 .

[50]  J. Brockner,et al.  The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, the Harder They Fall , 1992 .

[51]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Procedural fairness and self-esteem , 1993 .

[52]  Judith W. Tansky Justice and organizational citizenship behavior: What is the relationship? , 1993 .

[53]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. , 1993 .

[54]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. , 1994 .

[55]  A. Manstead,et al.  The influence of personal and collective self-esteem on strategies of social differentiation. , 1994, The British journal of social psychology.

[56]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. , 1995 .

[57]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. , 1996 .

[58]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer? , 1996 .