Praise, Blame, Obligation, and Beyond: Toward a Framework for Classical Supererogation and Kin

Continuing prior work ([1, 2]), I integrate a simple system for personal obligation with a system for aretaic (agent-evaluative) appraisal. I then explore various relationships between definable aretaic statuses such as praiseworthiness and blameworthiness and deontic statuses such as obligatoriness and impermissibility. I focus on partitions of the normative statuses generated (cf. "normative positions" but without explicit representation of agency). In addition to representing and exploring traditional questions in ethical theory about the connection between blame, praise, permissibility and obligation, this allows me to carefully represent schemes for supererogation and kin. These controversial concepts have provided challenges to both ethical theory and deontic logic, and are among deontic logic's test cases.

[1]  D. Heyd.  Supererogation : its status in ethical theory , 1982 .

[2]  Hans Johann Glock,et al.  CAMBRIDGE, JENA OR VIENNA? THE ROOTS OF THE TRACTATUS , 1992 .

[3]  J. Sulston,et al.  All for All , 2006, PLoS Biology.

[4]  Paul McNamara.  Doing well enough: Toward a logic for common-sense morality , 1996, Stud Logica.

[5]  Paul McNamara.  Doing Well Enough in an Andersonian-Kangerian Framework , 1998 .

[6]  P. McNamara,et al.  Making room for going beyond the call , 1996 .

[7]  David Widerker.  FRANKFURT ON 'OUGHT IMPLIES CAN' AND ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES , 1991 .

[8]  Mark A. Brown,et al.  Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems , 1996, Workshops in Computing.

[9]  Elizabeth M. Pybus.  ‘Saints and Heroes’ , 1982, Philosophy.

[10]  Paul McNamara.  Agential obligation as non-agential personal obligation plus agency , 2004, J. Appl. Log..

[11]  Gregory Mellema.  Supererogation, blame, and the limits of obligation , 1994 .

[12]  Paul McNamara,et al.  Toward a framework for agency, inevitability, praise and blame , 2000 .

[13]  Gregory Mellema.  Beyond the Call of Duty: Supererogation, Obligation, and Offence , 1991 .

[14]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Norms, Logics and Information Systems: New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science , 1998 .

[15]  Paul McNamara,et al.  Must I Do What I Ought? (Or Will the Least I Can Do Do?) , 1996, DEON.

[16]  R. M. Chisholm,et al.  Supererogation and Offence: A Conceptual Scheme for Ethics , 1963 .

[17]  Edwin D. Mares,et al.  Supererogation in Deontic Logic: Metatheory for DWE and Some Close Neighbours , 1997, Stud Logica.