Sources of Knowledge and Innovation: An Empirical Text at a Pan-European Regional Level

Innovation performance seems to rely on efficiently integrating and extending different pieces of various types of knowledge emerging from diverse external sources. Different research traditions have stressed both formal (FSK) and informal sources of knowledge (ISK) as innovation performance drivers. Thus, context-led views such as the innovative milieux approach, innovation systems literature and the knowledge spillover view have tended to focus on diverse, informal and location-facilitated sources of knowledge. Meanwhile, firm-led perspectives such as the innovator networks approach and the open innovation model have tended to emphasise formal, proprietary and well-structured collaboration agreements. However, regardless of the emphasis put on one or other sources of knowledge, the different research traditions seem to agree that both should be important for innovation purposes. We study the combined effect of formal (FSK) and informal sources of knowledge (ISK) on European regional innovation performance. Our findings show that the effect of both sources of knowledge on innovation performance is not simple and linear. First, both sources of knowledge prove to have an interaction effect on innovation performance (i.e. the effect of FSK on regional innovation depends on the level of access to ISK in the region, and vice versa). Second, while the effect of ISK is linear (although different for each region), the effect of the FSK (which are more intensive in monetary costs, time, effort and opportunity costs) has a diminishing returns form, and achieves a saturation point at high levels of use of FSK. Our findings also show that the balanced access to both types of sources is important and that, for instance, regions with limited access to ISK should not expect miraculous effects from high levels of FSK. To the best of our knowledge, previous research has not been reported that has empirically studied the combined effect of both sources of knowledge at a European regional level.

[1]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 09 . 04 Methodological Issues in Measuring Innovation Performance of Spatial Units , 2009 .

[2]  J. Sinacore Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[3]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[4]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[5]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[6]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[7]  R. Stough,et al.  Theories of Endogenous Regional Growth : Lessons for Regional Policies , 2011 .

[8]  Thomas Baumert,et al.  The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach , 2010 .

[9]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[10]  Riccardo Crescenzi,et al.  Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe , 2006 .

[11]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters , 2006 .

[12]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  A Policy Insight into the R&D-Patent Relationship , 2007 .

[13]  A. Lievens,et al.  Managing innovation through customer coproduced knowledge in electronic services: An exploratory study , 2008 .

[14]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[17]  J. M. Barrutia,et al.  Social capital, research and development, and innovation: An empirical analysis of Spanish and Italian regions , 2010 .

[18]  Matt Marx,et al.  Managing innovation in small worlds , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and Strength of Exchange Relationships , 2004 .

[20]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the network approach in analysing innovation , 1998 .

[21]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[22]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? , 2002 .

[23]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[24]  M. Justman,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and public schooling , 2000 .

[25]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Enterprise-University Co-operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems , 1999 .

[26]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[27]  Agnieszka NawrockaA,et al.  Address for correspondence , 2000 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[29]  Wei Zheng A Social Capital Perspective of Innovation from Individuals to Nations: Where is Empirical Literature Directing Us? , 2008 .

[30]  Philip R. Tomlinson,et al.  Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing , 2010 .

[31]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[32]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[33]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[34]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Treating Patents as Relational Data: Knowledge Transfers and Spillovers across Italian Provinces , 2011 .

[35]  E. Giuliani The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry , 2007 .

[36]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Innovation in regions: What does really matter? , 2005 .

[37]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[38]  H. Hollanders,et al.  Regional Innovation Scoreboard , 2014 .

[39]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[40]  M. Edwards Regional and Urban Economics and Economic Development: Theory and Methods , 2007 .

[41]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The Economy of Cities , 1969 .

[42]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[43]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Technological capability building through networking strategies within high-tech industries , 2002 .

[44]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[46]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[47]  Roel Rutten,et al.  Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Growth: The Theory and Practice of Learning Regions , 2001 .

[48]  Gottfried Tappeiner,et al.  The Learning Region: The Impact of Social Capital and Weak Ties on Innovation , 2007 .

[49]  L. D. Propris Innovation And Inter-Firm Co-Operation: The Case Of The West Midlands , 2000 .

[50]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[51]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Universities and Innovation in Space , 2007 .

[53]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions , 2003 .