Minimum required signal‐to‐noise ratio for optimal precision in HPLC and CE

In a survey, results of more than 100 assay determinations of various analytes (active pharmaceutical ingredients, methylparabene, chlorthalidone, and proteins) at different concentration levels were collected with signal‐to‐noise ratio (S/N) levels between 2 and higher than 10 000. It must be concluded that without having a S/N of at least 50, repeatabilities (combination of injection, separation process, and integration) of 2% cannot be achieved, in contrast to the general assumption that a S/N of 10 is sufficient for analytical HPLC. These data now confirm an earlier assumption with a much broader fundamental of measurements. The empirical functions %RSD = 58/(S/N) + 0.30 (for HPLC data) and %RSD = 73/(S/N) + 1.07 (for CE data) could be derived. It was shown that a S/N of greater than 100 is necessary for optimal precision. Before optimizing HPLC or CE methods, for example, for sample pretreatment, S/N > 100 should be the prerequisite, else optimal precision will not be achieved. Only after the detection‐related scatter is sufficiently reduced, other sources of variation can be successfully tackled.

[1]  R. Matsuda,et al.  Prediction of precision from signal and noise measurement in liquid chromatography: Limit of detection , 1995 .

[2]  A computational study on the effect of random noise on the precision and accuracy of the integration of chromatographic peaks , 1999 .

[3]  C. Riley,et al.  BIS repetita non placent -- a statistical analysis of the number of sample preparations and number of injections required for chromatographic analyses. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  H. Wätzig,et al.  Wide concentration range investigation of recovery, precision and error structure in liquid chromatography. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[5]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  How to achieve higher repeatability and reproducibility in capillary electrophoresis. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  Qiu Jia,et al.  International harmonization and enligtenment of the Common Technical Document under the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use , 2005 .

[7]  U. Holzgrabe 11 The need for CE methods in pharmacopoeial monographs , 2008 .

[8]  B. Renger System performance and variability of chromatographic techniques used in pharmaceutical quality control. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[9]  Kehl Kg,et al.  Argentometric titration for the determination of liquid chromatographic injection reproducibility. , 2001 .

[10]  H. Wätzig,et al.  Strategies for capillary electrophoresis: Method development and validation for pharmaceutical and biological applications , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[11]  Lloyd R. Snyder,et al.  Practical HPLC method development , 1988 .

[12]  Veronika R. Meyer,et al.  Pitfalls and errors of HPLC in pictures , 1997 .

[13]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns: I. Experimental protocol , 1999 .

[14]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns. IV. Results obtained with Luna C18 (2) columns. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[15]  H. Wätzig,et al.  Quantitation and validation of cis-camphoric acid 3-methyl ester and cis-camphoric acid 1-methyl ester using CE. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[16]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Means of validation of HPLC systems and components , 1997 .

[17]  Lloyd R. Snyder,et al.  Practical HPLC Method Development: Snyder/Practical , 1997 .

[18]  L. Suntornsuk,et al.  Precision improvement for the analysis of flavonoids in selected Thai plants by capillary zone electrophoresis , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[19]  Ulrike Holzgrabe,et al.  Why not using capillary electrophoresis in drug analysis? , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[20]  Hermann Wätzig,et al.  Performance of instruments and aspects of methodology and validation in quantitative capillary electrophoresis. An update , 1997 .

[21]  H. Wätzig,et al.  Precise quantitative capillary electrophoresis: Methodological and instrumental aspects , 1993 .

[22]  H. Smit,et al.  Base-line noise and detection limits in signal-integrating analytical methods. Application to chromatography , 1975 .

[23]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Validation of a chromatography data analysis software. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.