The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND We have little systematic information about the extent to which standard processes involved in health care--a key element of quality--are delivered in the United States. METHODS We telephoned a random sample of adults living in 12 metropolitan areas in the United States and asked them about selected health care experiences. We also received written consent to copy their medical records for the most recent two-year period and used this information to evaluate performance on 439 indicators of quality of care for 30 acute and chronic conditions as well as preventive care. We then constructed aggregate scores. RESULTS Participants received 54.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 54.3 to 55.5) of recommended care. We found little difference among the proportion of recommended preventive care provided (54.9 percent), the proportion of recommended acute care provided (53.5 percent), and the proportion of recommended care provided for chronic conditions (56.1 percent). Among different medical functions, adherence to the processes involved in care ranged from 52.2 percent for screening to 58.5 percent for follow-up care. Quality varied substantially according to the particular medical condition, ranging from 78.7 percent of recommended care (95 percent confidence interval, 73.3 to 84.2) for senile cataract to 10.5 percent of recommended care (95 percent confidence interval, 6.8 to 14.6) for alcohol dependence. CONCLUSIONS The deficits we have identified in adherence to recommended processes for basic care pose serious threats to the health of the American public. Strategies to reduce these deficits in care are warranted.

[1]  F. Mosteller,et al.  A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. , 1992, JAMA.

[2]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Quality Measures for Prenatal Care: A Comparison of Care in Six Health Care Plans , 1994 .

[3]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Assessing the Predictive Validity of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Criteria for Performing Carotid Endarterectomy , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  S. Asch,et al.  Underuse of Primary Mycobacterium avium Complex and Pneumocystis carinii Prophylaxis in the United States , 2001, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[5]  P Kemper,et al.  The design of the community tracking study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. , 1996, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[6]  E. McGlynn,et al.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States? , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[7]  J. Luck,et al.  The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical record , 2002, Journal of medical ethics.

[8]  E. McGlynn,et al.  New approach to assessing clinical quality of care for women: the QA Tool system. , 1999, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[9]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Donald M. Berwick,et al.  Connections Between Quality Measurement and Improvement , 2003, Medical care.

[11]  P. Cunningham.  Declining Employer-Sponsored Coverage: The Role of Public Programs and Implications for Access to Care , 2002, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[12]  S. Jencks,et al.  Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001. , 2003, JAMA.

[13]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Measuring the clinical consistency of panelists' appropriateness ratings: the case of coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1997, Health policy.

[14]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Measuring underuse of necessary care among elderly Medicare beneficiaries using inpatient and outpatient claims. , 2000, JAMA.

[15]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Choosing and evaluating clinical performance measures. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[16]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Quality of Care for Women: A Review of Selected Clinical Conditions and Quality Indicators , 2000 .

[17]  J. Luck,et al.  Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Quality of Care for General Medical Conditions: A Review of the Literature and Quality Indicators , 2000 .

[19]  P. Ginsburg,et al.  Tracking health care costs. , 2001, Health affairs.

[20]  D Draper,et al.  Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. , 1990, JAMA.

[21]  V. Pavlik,et al.  Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Engelgau,et al.  A Diabetes Report Card for the United States: Quality of Care in the 1990s , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Quality of Care for Cardiopulmonary Conditions: A Review of the Literature and Quality Indicators , 2000 .

[24]  S. Payne,et al.  Variations in pediatric pneumonia and bronchitis/asthma admission rates. Is appropriateness a factor? , 1995, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[25]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Aspirin in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Patterns of use and outcomes. , 1995, Circulation.

[26]  Robert H. Brook,et al.  Keeping quality on the policy agenda. , 2001, Health affairs.

[27]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[28]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context , 1990, The Lancet.

[29]  Robert H. Miller,et al.  Managed care plan performance since 1980. A literature analysis. , 1994, JAMA.

[30]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[31]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. A four-state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1995, JAMA.

[32]  C. Albert,et al.  Adjunctive drug therapy of acute myocardial infarction--evidence from clinical trials. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  B. B. Fleming,et al.  Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels. , 2000, JAMA.

[34]  P Lapuerta,et al.  A new approach for measuring quality of care for women with hypertension. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[36]  R. Phillips,et al.  Comparison of the quality of ambulatory care for fee-for-service and prepaid patients. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[37]  N. Powe,et al.  Costs vs quality in different types of primary care settings. , 1994, JAMA.

[38]  S. Asch,et al.  Underuse of primary Mycobacterium avium complex and Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis in the United States. , 2001 .

[39]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Quality of Care for Oncologic Conditions and HIV , 2000 .

[40]  J W Peabody,et al.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. , 2000, JAMA.

[41]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Variation among hospitals in coronary-angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  Bradley C Strunk,et al.  The changing face of managed care. , 2002, Health affairs.

[43]  J. Marks,et al.  State trends in health risk factors and receipt of clinical preventive services among US adults during the 1990s. , 2002, JAMA.

[44]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[45]  L. Howie,et al.  Ophthalmic examination among adults with diagnosed diabetes mellitus. , 1993, JAMA.

[46]  A. Crook,et al.  Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  S. Woolf.  The need for perspective in evidence-based medicine. , 1999, JAMA.

[48]  J P Kahan,et al.  The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.