An approach to robust optimization of impact problems using random samples and meta-modelling

Conventionally optimized structures may show a tendency to be sensitive to variations, for instance in geometry and loading conditions. To avoid this, research has been carried out in the field of robust optimization where variations are taken into account in the optimization process. The overall objective is to create solutions that are optimal both in the sense of mean performance and minimum variability. This work presents an alternative approach to robust optimization, where the robustness of each design is assessed through multiple sampling of the stochastic variables at each design point. Meta-models for the robust optimization are created for both the mean value and the standard deviation of the response. Furthermore, the method is demonstrated on an analytical example and an example of an aluminium extrusion with quadratic cross-section subjected to axial crushing. It works well for the chosen examples and it is concluded that the method is especially well suited for problems with a large number of random variables, since the computational cost is essentially independent of the number of random variables. In addition, the presented approach makes it possible to take into consideration variations that cannot be described with a variable. This is demonstrated in this work by random geometrical perturbations described with the use of Gaussian random fields.

[1]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[2]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Development of a sequential optimization procedure for robust design and tolerance design within a bi-objective paradigm , 2008 .

[3]  Kaushik Sinha,et al.  Multi-objective robust optimisation for crashworthiness during side impact , 2007 .

[4]  Samy Missoum Controlling structural failure modes during an impact in the presence of uncertainties , 2007 .

[5]  Marcus Redhe On vehicle crashworthiness design using structural optimization , 2004 .

[6]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Simulation of Multi-Dimensional Gaussian Stochastic Fields by Spectral Representation , 1996 .

[7]  Jay D. Martin,et al.  A Monte Carlo Method for Reliability-Based Design Opitmization , 2006 .

[8]  S. Ghanmi,et al.  Robust Design in Structural Mechanics , 2006 .

[9]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Experimental investigations on the behaviour of short to long square aluminium tubes subjected to axial loading , 2004 .

[10]  Samy Missoum,et al.  Probabilistic optimal design in the presence of random fields , 2008 .

[11]  Kwon-Hee Lee,et al.  Th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization a Global Robust Optimization Using the Kriging Based Approximation Model , 2022 .

[12]  Kwon-Hee Lee,et al.  A Global Robust Optimization Using Kriging Based Approximation Model , 2006 .

[13]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Stochastic simulations of square aluminium tubes subjected to axial loading , 2007 .

[14]  G. Geoffrey Vining,et al.  Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach , 1990 .

[15]  G. Geoffrey Vining,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR ESTIMATING BOTH MEAN AND VARIANCE FUNCTIONS , 1996 .

[16]  G. Cheng,et al.  Robust design of non-linear structures using optimization methods , 2005 .

[17]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[18]  Y. Gene Liao FEA-based prediction and experimental validation of clutch transient temperature in automatic transmission , 2007 .

[19]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .

[20]  George Stefanou,et al.  Stochastic finite element analysis of shells with combined random material and geometric properties , 2004 .

[21]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Development of a multidisciplinary–multiresponse robust design optimization model , 2008 .

[22]  Yun Li,et al.  Optimization and robustness for crashworthiness of side impact , 2001 .