Task analysis: Part IIThe scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide 1

Task analysis can be reduced to two fundamentally different types of procedure. The first type involves recording and classifying the main elements of the work system, the tasks involved, and the demands imposed on the basis of a stimulus organism response (SOR) paradigm. The second type evaluates the subjective perception of the work by the worker. These two types are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, they are complementary in that the redefinition process (the worker's subjective perception) is not directly observable, whereas the tangible elements of the tasks and the stress factors recorded by objective task analysis procedures, such as postition analysis questionnaire (PAQ) and ergonomic job analysis procedure (AET) are directly observable. The design and execution of work system analyses depend primarily on their theoretical basis and the object of the analysis, for example, the work system, the job, and the individual worker. A comprehensive task analysis system can provide information on the undesirable components of a given job, better appreciation of the psychological stresses arising in the job, and a greater understanding of the tasks and requirements involved.

[1]  Wolfgang Laurig Simulationsmethoden zum Abschätzen des Erholzeitbedarfs , 1971 .

[2]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  The role of error in organizing behaviour* , 1990 .

[3]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Task analysis for error identification: a methodology for designing error-tolerant consumer products , 1994 .

[4]  Kurt Landau,et al.  Recent Developments in Job Analysis Proceedings of the International Symposium onJob Analysis, University of Hohenheim, March 14-15 1989 , 1989 .

[5]  Kurt Landau,et al.  Arbeitswissenschaftlicher Erhebungsbogen zur Tätigkeitsanalyse AET , 1974 .

[6]  R. H. Haase,et al.  A Survey of the Literature on Job Analysis of Technical Positions , 1953 .

[7]  Walter Rohmert,et al.  Formen menschlicher Arbeit , 1983 .

[8]  K. Spence The postulates and methods of behaviorism. , 1948, Psychological review.

[9]  Walter Rohmert,et al.  Evaluation of worker workload in flexible manufacturing industry , 1992 .

[10]  Walter Rohmert Aufgaben und Inhalt der Arbeitswissenschaft , 1972 .

[11]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Development of a Taxonomy of Human Performance: A Feasibility Study of Ability Dimensions for Classifying Human Tasks. , 1970 .

[12]  E M Roth,et al.  Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[13]  E. Grochla Handwörterbuch der Organisation , 1969 .

[14]  REFA-Verband,et al.  Methodenlehre des Arbeitsstudiums , 1971 .

[15]  J. Hackman,et al.  Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[16]  G. F. Rabideau,et al.  Field Measurement of Human Performance in Man—Machine Systems , 1964, Human factors.

[17]  Kurt Landau,et al.  Das Arbeitswissenschaftliche Erhebungsverfahren zur Tätigkeitsanalyse - AET , 1978 .

[18]  Ernest J. McCormick,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT AND BACKGROUND OF THE POSITION ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRE , 1969 .

[19]  K. Landau,et al.  Untersuchung der Körperhaltungen bei der Flugzeugbeladung mit der OWAS-Methode , 1995 .

[20]  Oswald Neuberger,et al.  Messung und Analyse von Arbeitszufriedenheit : Erfahrungen mit dem"Arbeitsbeschreibungsbogen (ABB)" , 1978 .

[21]  Walter Rohmert,et al.  TASK ANALYSIS : PART I - GUIDELINES FOR THE PRACTITIONER , 1998 .

[22]  Walter Rohmert,et al.  Arbeitswissenschaftliche Beurteilung der Belastung und Beanspruchung an unterschiedlichen industriellen Arbeitsplätzen , 1975 .

[23]  H. P. Sims,et al.  The Measurement of Job Characteristics , 1976 .

[24]  Robert G. Kinkade,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A TAXONOMY OF HUMAN PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW OF THE FIRST YEAR'S PROGRESS , 1968 .

[25]  Ekkehart Frieling,et al.  Occupational analysis: some details of an illustrative German project , 1977 .

[26]  Walter Rohmert,et al.  Problemanalyse zur Erarbeitung eines arbeitswissenschaftlichen Instrumentariums fürTätigkeitsanalysen , 1973 .

[27]  B. Lynch An Empirical Assessment of Perrow's Technology Construct. , 1974 .

[28]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  The use of protocol analysis for determining ability requirements for personnel selection on a computer-based task , 1994 .

[29]  T. W. van der Schaaf Developing and using cognitive task typologies , 1993 .

[30]  J. Hackman,et al.  The Job Diagnostic Survey: An Instrument for the Diagnosis of Jobs and the Evaluation of Job Redesign Projects , 1974 .

[31]  W. W. Ronan,et al.  JOB ANALYSIS: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1971 .

[32]  Jacques Leplat,et al.  Relations between task and activity: Elements for elaborating a framework for error analysis. , 1990 .

[33]  M K Mattila,et al.  Job load and hazard analysis: a method for the analysis of workplace conditions for occupational health care. , 1985, British journal of industrial medicine.

[34]  B Walton,et al.  Job and Task Analysis. , 1979 .

[35]  Joseph E. Morsh,et al.  Job analysis in the United States Air Force. , 1964 .

[36]  J. E. Zerga Job analysis: a résumé and bibliography. , 1943 .

[37]  Walter Rohmert,et al.  Belastungen und Beanspruchungen , 1982 .

[38]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[39]  Raymond E Christal,et al.  IMPACT OF THE COMPUTER ON JOB ANALYSIS IN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE , 1966 .

[40]  Holger Luczak Untersuchungen informatorischer Belastung und Beanspruchung des Menschen , 1975 .

[41]  Andrew Shepherd An approach to information requirements specification for process control tasks , 1993 .