Design and sensitivity analysis using the probability-safety-factor method. An application to retaining walls

This paper presents a new method for designing engineering works that makes the classical approach, based on safety factors, and the modern, probability-based, approach compatible, and includes a sensitivity analysis. The method consists of a sequence of classical designs, based on given safety factors, that (a) minimize cost or optimize an alternative objective function, (b) calculate the different failure mode probabilities or their upper bounds, and (c) update the safety factors to satisfy both the safety factors and the failure probability requirements. The process is repeated until convergence. As a result, an automatic design of the engineering work, the safety factors and the corresponding probabilities of failure for all failure modes are obtained. A double safety check is used and the correspondence between safety factors and probabilities of failure for the different modes are easily understood. An advantage of this approach is that the optimization procedure and the reliability calculations are decoupled. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is performed using a method that consists of transforming the data parameters into artificial variables and using the dual associated problem. The method is illustrated by its application to a retaining wall design.

[1]  E. Polak,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Series Structural Systems , 2001 .

[2]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Cost Optimization of Concrete Structures , 1999 .

[3]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[4]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[5]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[6]  Ulf Ringertz,et al.  ON METHODS FOR DISCRETE STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION , 1988 .

[7]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[8]  Enrique Castillo Extreme value theory in engineering , 1988 .

[9]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  COST OPTIMIZATION OF STEEL STRUCTURES , 2000 .

[10]  H. U. Köylüoglu,et al.  New Approximations for SORM Integrals , 1994 .

[11]  E. Castillo,et al.  High-Probability One-Sided Confidence Intervals in Reliability Models , 1997 .

[12]  J. D. T. Oliveira,et al.  The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics , 1979 .

[13]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Advances in Design Optimization , 1994 .

[14]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[15]  P. Wirsching,et al.  Advanced Reliability Methods for Structural Evaluation , 1987 .

[16]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Tail Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Networks , 1996, UAI.

[17]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Estimating extreme probabilities using tail simulated data , 1997, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[18]  O. H. Burnside,et al.  Probabilistic methods for structural response analysis , 1988 .

[19]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[20]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  DISCRETE COST OPTIMIZATION OF COMPOSITE FLOORS USING A FLOATING-POINT GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2001 .

[21]  F. E. Haskin,et al.  Efficient uncertainty analyses using fast probability integration , 1996 .

[22]  K. Breitung Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals , 1984 .

[23]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Computational Mechanics of Probabilistic and Reliability Analysis , 1991 .