Ultrasound in Labor and Delivery
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Sherer,et al. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[2] Glen Mola,et al. Factors associated with success or failure in trials of vacuum extraction , 2002, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.
[3] J. Crane. Factors Predicting Labor Induction Success: A Critical Analysis , 2006, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.
[4] J. Hobbins,et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[5] K. Nicolaides,et al. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[6] G. Pilu,et al. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[7] Tanneguy Redarce,et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[8] G Y Wong,et al. Transabdominal ultrasound assessment of the fetal head and the accuracy of vacuum cup application , 2007, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[9] Z. Bhutta,et al. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour , 2009, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.
[10] K. Nicolaides,et al. Pre‐induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[11] A. Antsaklis,et al. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor , 2003, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[12] E. Hodnett,et al. Instrumental vaginal delivery , 2000 .
[13] K. Nicolaides,et al. Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[14] Smita I. Rane,et al. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[15] B. Tutschek,et al. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[16] E. Laakkonen,et al. Intrapartum Sonography and Persistent Occiput Posterior Position: A Study of 408 Deliveries , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[17] Roberto Romero,et al. Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[18] D. Sherer,et al. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[19] J. Lange,et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[20] P. Crowley,et al. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[21] H. Dietz,et al. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[22] K. Nicolaides,et al. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[23] C. O'Herlihy,et al. Influence of Persistent Occiput Posterior Position on Delivery Outcome , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[24] A. Sizer,et al. Occipitoposterior Position: Associated Factors and Obstetric Outcome in Nulliparas , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.