Using the interactive whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom

Abstract All communication is inherently multimodal, and understandings of science need to be multidimensional. The interactive whiteboard offers a range of potential benefits to the primary science classroom in terms of relative ease of integration of a number of presentational and ICT functions, which, taken together, offers new opportunities for fostering multifaceted pedagogic strategies. In this case study, we examine in detail how a teacher pursues two themes across four science lessons. We examine how the teacher creates continuity in her students’ learning experiences through taking up some of the affordances of the IWB in order to represent scientific phenomena and engage children in activities to consolidate their understandings. Support is offered for the notion that while pedagogic goals and strategies must determine the selection of tools, rather than the ‘tail wagging the dog’ as in technology-focussed hyperbole, planned use of the interactive whiteboard, conceptualized as a ‘heterogeneous mediational tool kit’ (Wertsch 1991), can be effectively integrated into teaching practice.

[1]  A. Farrington.  Learning revolution. , 1993, Nursing times.

[2]  J. Wertsch.  Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[3]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[4]  David Moseley,et al.  Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies:Final Report , 2005 .

[5]  Mary Louise Gomez.  The Role of Talk in Learning to Teach , 2002 .

[6]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design , 1996 .

[7]  Philip Scott,et al.  Using a Bridging Representation and Social Interactions to Foster Conceptual Change: Designing and Evaluating an Instructional Sequence for Newton's Third Law. , 2005 .

[8]  P. Scott,et al.  Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education , 2003 .

[9]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al.  Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[10]  James V. Wertsch,et al.  The Architecture and Dynamics of Intersubjectivity in Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[11]  R. Kozma.  The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[12]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  M. Sedlak.  Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education , 2003 .

[14]  Julia Gillen,et al.  A ‘learning revolution’? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms 1 , 2007 .

[15]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design , 1999 .

[16]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy, and Pupil Performance: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (London Challenge) , 2007 .

[17]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking , 2007 .

[18]  Steve Higgins,et al.  Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..