What is science’s crisis really about?

[1]  Carla Bagnoli.  The great endarkenment , 2018 .

[2]  S. Glantz,et al.  Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future , 2016 .

[4]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  Building on success and learning from experience: an independent review of the Research Excellence Framework , 2016 .

[5]  D. Kahan.  On the Sources of Ordinary Science Knowledge and Extraordinary Science Ignorance , 2016 .

[6]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[7]  S. Cooke.  The unscientific method , 2016 .

[8]  N. Lazar,et al.  The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose , 2016 .

[9]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” , 2016, Science.

[10]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[11]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  Romance, risk, and replication: Can consumer choices and risk-taking be primed by mating motives? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[13]  Monya Baker,et al.  Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test , 2015, Nature.

[14]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Policy: The future of public trust in science , 2015, Nature.

[15]  James Wilsdon,et al.  We need a measured approach to metrics , 2015, Nature.

[16]  Frederick Grinnell.  Rethink our approach to assessing risk , 2015, Nature.

[17]  T. Lancet.  Rewarding true inquiry and diligence in research , 2015, The Lancet.

[18]  D. Cressey.  Giant international trade treaties centre on science , 2015, Nature.

[19]  M. Giampietro,et al.  The fallacy of evidence based policy , 2015, 1607.07398.

[20]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth , 2015 .

[21]  Richard Horton,et al.  Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma? , 2015, The Lancet.

[22]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Surrogate Science , 2015 .

[23]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research , 2015, Circulation research.

[24]  C. Carrozza.  Democratizing Expertise and Environmental Governance: Different Approaches to the Politics of Science and their Relevance for Policy Analysis , 2015 .

[25]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Climate Models as Economic Guides: Scientific Challenge or Quixotic Quest? , 2015 .

[26]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  How to Make More Published Research True , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[27]  Peter Gluckman,et al.  Policy: The art of science advice to government , 2014, Nature.

[28]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  When all models are wrong: More stringent quality criteria are needed for models used at the science-policy interface , 2014 .

[29]  M. Hvistendahl.  China's publication bazaar. , 2013, Science.

[30]  C. Begley,et al.  Reproducibility: Six red flags for suspect work , 2013, Nature.

[31]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  Uncertainty and Dissent in Climate Risk Assessment: A Post-Normal Perspective , 2012 .

[32]  C. Begley,et al.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research , 2012, Nature.

[33]  Philip Mirowski.  Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science , 2011 .

[34]  J. Ravetz.  Postnormal Science and the maturing of the structural contradictions of modern European science , 2011 .

[35]  D. Fanelli.  Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data , 2010, PloS one.

[36]  D. Fanelli.  “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  D. Fanelli.  How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  Jack Stilgoe,et al.  Citizen Scientists: Reconnecting Science with Civil Society , 2009 .

[39]  P. Weingart,et al.  Scientific Advice to Policy Making , 2009 .

[40]  Sara Schroter,et al.  What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? , 2008, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[41]  J. Brooks.  Why most published research findings are false: Ioannidis JP, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece , 2008 .

[42]  V. Lakshmi.  Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future , 2007 .

[43]  Rebecca Boden,et al.  Managing the research imagination? Globalisation and research in higher education , 2006 .

[44]  H. Catton.  Who owns our future? , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[45]  S. Toulmin.  Return to Reason , 2001 .

[46]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  Peer Review and Quality Control , 2001 .

[47]  J. Ravetz.  Science, New Forms of , 2001 .

[48]  E. Reinert.  Full circle: economics from scholasticism through innovation and back into mathematical scholasticism: Reflections on a 1769 Price essay: “Why is it that economics so far has gained so few advantages from physics and mathematics?” , 2000 .

[49]  S. Toulmin.  Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .

[50]  John L. Casti,et al.  Paradigms lost : tackling the unanswered mysteries of modern science , 1991 .

[51]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[52]  D. Collingridge,et al.  Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making , 1986 .

[53]  E. F. Schumacher.  Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered , 1973 .

[54]  J. Ravetz.  Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .

[55]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[56]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of science , 1962 .

[57]  Richard S. Rudner.  The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments , 1953, Philosophy of Science.