Identifying Children's Peer Social Networks in School Classrooms: Links Between Peer Reports and Observed Interactions

Links between peer reports of social cluster membership and observed classroom interactions were examined in a sample of 72 children in 4th grade and 7th grade. All participating children in each classroom identified as many social clusters in the classroom as they could recall. Using the social-cognitive map (SCM) procedure, these individual reports were aggregated to summarize the number of times a given child was nominated as being in the same social cluster as each of his or her classmates (i.e., a co-nomination profile) and to identify the classmates in each child's social cluster. Extensive classroom observations allowed for a parallel summary of the number of times a given child was observed to interact with each of his or her classmates (i.e., an interaction profile). Results indicated that correlations between conomination profiles and interaction profiles were positive and statistically reliable. Children were observed to interact with members of their SCM-identified social cluster at a rate four times higher than with other same-sex classmates. These effects did not vary reliably by grade, sex or aggressive risk status.

[1]  J. Strayer,et al.  An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children. , 1976 .

[2]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The NEGOPY network analysis program , 1981 .

[3]  E. Waters,et al.  Attention structure, sociometric status, and dominance: Interrelations, behavioral correlates, and relationships to social competence. , 1981 .

[4]  R. Cairns,et al.  Predicting aggressive patterns in girls and boys: A developmental study , 1984, Aggressive Behavior.

[5]  R. Cairns,et al.  Social Structure and Social Cognition in Early Adolescence: Affiliative Patterns , 1985 .

[6]  Ann S. Masten,et al.  A revised class play method of peer assessment. , 1985 .

[7]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? , 1988 .

[8]  R. Cairns,et al.  Growth and aggression: I. Childhood to early adolescence. , 1989 .

[9]  Thomas A. Kindermann,et al.  Natural Peer Groups as Contexts for Individual Development: The Case of Children's Motivation in School. , 1993 .

[10]  C. Evans,et al.  “NO EXIT” , 1993 .

[11]  D. Kinney.  From Nerds to Normals: The Recovery of Identity among Adolescents from Middle School to High School. , 1993 .

[12]  T. Farmer,et al.  Social Networks in Mainstream Classrooms , 1994 .

[13]  R B Cairns,et al.  Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. , 1995, Child development.

[14]  T. Kindermann.  Strategies for the Study of Individual Development within Naturally‐Existing Peer Groups* , 1996 .

[15]  António J. Santos,et al.  Affiliative Structures in Preschool Peer Groups. , 1996 .

[16]  M. Leung.  Social Networks and Self Enhancement in Chinese Children: A Comparison of Self Reports and Peer Reports of Group Membership* , 1996 .

[17]  W. Hartup.  The company they keep: friendships and their developmental significance. , 1996, Child development.

[18]  T. Farmer,et al.  Antisocial and Prosocial Correlates of Classroom Social Positions: The Social Network Centrality Perspective , 1996 .

[19]  H. Neckerman.  The Stability of Social Groups in Childhood and Adolescence: The Role of the Classroom Social Environment. , 1996 .

[20]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Peer networks and bullying in schools , 1997 .

[21]  R. Cairns,et al.  The popularity of friendship and the neglect of social networks: toward a new balance. , 1998, New directions for child development.

[22]  R. Cairns,et al.  Social Networks and Configurations in Inner-City Schools: Aggression, Popularity, and Implications for Students with EBD , 1999 .

[23]  C. Bagwell,et al.  Peer Clique Participation and Social Status in Preadolescence. , 2000 .

[24]  J. L. Mahoney,et al.  School extracurricular activity participation as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. , 2000, Child development.

[25]  T. Farmer,et al.  Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[26]  B. Vaughn,et al.  Dyadic analyses of friendship in a sample of preschool-age children attending Head Start: correspondence between measures and implications for social competence. , 2001, Child development.

[27]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  Peer Experience: Common and Unique Features of Number of Friendships, Social Network Centrality, and Sociometric Status , 2001 .

[28]  R. Cairns,et al.  Predicting teen motherhood and teen fatherhood: individual characteristics and peer affiliations. , 2001 .

[29]  R. Cairns,et al.  Aggression in Inner-City Early Elementary Classrooms: Individual and Peer-Group Configurations , 2002 .