Connecting external knowledge usage and firm performance: An empirical analysis

Prior research suggests that firms create breakthrough innovations by using external knowledge, but it also underscores the difficulties firms face in acquiring and applying external knowledge. In this paper, we combine these insights to examine the conditions under which external knowledge usage will either enhance or erode firm performance. In particular, we argue that high external knowledge usage has a negative effect on performance when firms enter multiple new product markets, but a positive effect on performance when firms using external knowledge have higher absorptive capacity. We find general support for our hypotheses, which we test using patent citation data from the global integrated circuit manufacturing industry. Our findings have important implications for managers of firms making strategic decisions about their firms' product portfolios and the degree to which they use external knowledge.

[1]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[2]  H. Barkema,et al.  Pace, rhythm and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation , 2002 .

[3]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Foreignness and the diffusion of ideas , 2005 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  M. Hitt,et al.  Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay , 2000 .

[6]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments , 2001 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[9]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[11]  David Loree,et al.  Density-dependent strategic action: Outcomes of structural market commitment in the global integrated circuit industry , 2008 .

[12]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Assessment and redirection of longitudinal analysis : Demonstration with a study of the diversification and divestiture relationship , 1997 .

[13]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Acquiring Knowledge by Foreign Partners from International Joint Ventures in a Transition Economy: Learning-by-Doing and Learning Myopia , 2002 .

[14]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[15]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[16]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[17]  J. Barney.  Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[18]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[19]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[20]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[21]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[22]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: the case of NUMMI and General Motors , 2008 .

[23]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance: The Role of Transfer Effects , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[24]  M. Freel,et al.  Small Firm Innovation, Growth and Performance , 2004 .

[25]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Learning Negotiation Skills: Four Models of Knowledge Creation and Transfer , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Choonwoo Lee,et al.  Internal capabilities, external linkages, and performance. A study on technology-based ventures , 2001 .

[27]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[29]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[30]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[31]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[33]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[34]  Linda A. Hall,et al.  A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry , 2002 .

[35]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[36]  Michael Gibbert,et al.  Strategic networks : learning to compete , 2007 .

[37]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[38]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[40]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004 .

[41]  A. Agrawal.  Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge , 2006 .

[42]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[44]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[45]  M. Crossan,et al.  From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research , 2004 .

[46]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[47]  Lars Schweizer.  Knowledge transfer and R&D in pharmaceutical companies: A case study , 2005 .

[48]  P. Bierly,et al.  Analyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach , 2001 .

[49]  M. Hitt,et al.  Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives , 2000 .

[50]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[51]  Mathew L. A. Hayward.  When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995 , 2002 .

[52]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[53]  E. Levitas,et al.  Survival and the introduction of new technology: A patent analysis in the integrated circuit industry , 2006 .

[54]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[55]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[56]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Responding to Hypercompetition: The Structure and Processes of a Regional Learning Network Organization , 1996 .

[57]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[58]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures , 2000 .

[59]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[60]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[61]  Stephen Chen,et al.  Task partitioning in new product development teams: A knowledge and learning perspective , 2005 .

[62]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Strategy and Circumstance: the Response of American Firms to Japanese Competition in Semiconductors, 1980-1995 , 2000 .

[63]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of organizations , 1996 .

[64]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Believing Is Seeing: Joint Ventures and Organization Learning* , 1995 .

[65]  A. Madhok.  Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production , 2002 .

[66]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[67]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[68]  Jiatao Li,et al.  Knowledge Search in International Cooperative Ventures , 1999 .

[69]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations , 2007 .

[70]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[71]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[72]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[73]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[74]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[75]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. , 1990 .

[76]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[77]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[78]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[79]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[80]  Christine W. Soo,et al.  Knowledge Management: Philosophy, Processes, and Pitfalls , 2002 .

[81]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[82]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[83]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .

[84]  R. Parente,et al.  Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation , 2007 .

[85]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? Product Proliferation and Organizational Failure , 2001 .

[86]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[87]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[88]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Internal knowledge generation: the research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry , 2000 .

[89]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[90]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[91]  Sharon F. Matusik.  An empirical investigation of firm public and private knowledge , 2002 .