Performance study and simulation analysis of CSMA and IEEE 802.11 in wireless sensor networks and limitations of IEEE 802.11

Since its birth wireless communication became an indispensible part of the modern society. One major area that has a gigantic impact on the performance of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer. Many random access protocols exist in wireless sensor networks. Some of these protocols include Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA), Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (MACA), Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance for wireless (MACAW) and IEEE 802.11. All the protocols mentioned above except CSMA use Request To Send/Clear To Send (RTS/CTS) packets to avoid collisions (hidden terminal problem) which was a great problem for CSMA and that is the reason CSMA is almost obsolete for wireless communications. But after using RTS/CTS packets the protocols have to encounter some extra problems such as, energy consumption and end-to-end delay. The objective of this paper is to show the pros and cons of using RTS/CTS packets by comparing CSMA (does not use RTS/CTS) and IEEE 802.11 (uses RTS/CTS packets). We also portray that under some specific scenario the IEEE 802.11 is outperformed by CSMA which is also the novelty and contribution of this research work. This observation suggests that a lot of works have to be done to consider IEEE 802.11 an approximate perfect MAC layer protocol for WSNs.

[1]  Sridhar Iyer,et al.  Mitigating the exposed node problem in IEEE 802.11 ad hoc networks , 2003, Proceedings. 12th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.03EX712).

[2]  L. Kleinrock,et al.  Packet Switching in Radio Channels : Part Il-The Hidden Terminal Problem in Carrier Sense Multiple-Access and the Busy-Tone Solution , 2022 .

[3]  David M. Nicol,et al.  Towards high performance modeling of the 802.11 wireless protocol , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[4]  Andreas Willig,et al.  A short survey of wireless sensor networks , 2003 .

[5]  Satish Kumar,et al.  Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[6]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Random access MAC for efficient broadcast support in ad hoc networks , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[7]  Kay Römer,et al.  The design space of wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  Cem Ersoy,et al.  MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Jorge Nuevo.  A Comprehensible GloMoSim Tutorial , 2004 .

[10]  Nader Mohamed,et al.  Middleware: middleware challenges and approaches for wireless sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Distributed Systems Online.

[11]  L. Kleinrock,et al.  Packet Switching in Radio Channels: Part I - Carrier Sense Multiple-Access Modes and Their Throughput-Delay Characteristics , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  S. Manesis,et al.  A Survey of Applications of Wireless Sensors and Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation Intelligent Control, 2005..

[13]  Robert A. Scholtz,et al.  Performance Analysis of , 1998 .

[14]  Kwang-Cheng Chen,et al.  Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11 CSMA/CA medium access control protocol , 1996, Proceedings of PIMRC '96 - 7th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communications.