Analysis of spatial heterogeneity in normal epithelium and preneoplastic alterations in mouse prostate tumor models

Cancer involves histological changes in tissue, which is of primary importance in pathological diagnosis and research. Automated histological analysis requires ability to computationally separate pathological alterations from normal tissue with all its variables. On the other hand, understanding connections between genetic alterations and histological attributes requires development of enhanced analysis methods suitable also for small sample sizes. Here, we set out to develop computational methods for early detection and distinction of prostate cancer-related pathological alterations. We use analysis of features from HE stained histological images of normal mouse prostate epithelium, distinguishing the descriptors for variability between ventral, lateral, and dorsal lobes. In addition, we use two common prostate cancer models, Hi-Myc and Pten+/− mice, to build a feature-based machine learning model separating the early pathological lesions provoked by these genetic alterations. This work offers a set of computational methods for separation of early neoplastic lesions in the prostates of model mice, and provides proof-of-principle for linking specific tumor genotypes to quantitative histological characteristics. The results obtained show that separation between different spatial locations within the organ, as well as classification between histologies linked to different genetic backgrounds, can be performed with very high specificity and sensitivity.

[1]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  Todd H. Stokes,et al.  Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[3]  James Diamond,et al.  The use of morphological characteristics and texture analysis in the identification of tissue composition in prostatic neoplasia. , 2004, Human pathology.

[4]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[5]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[6]  Dayong Wang,et al.  Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[8]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[9]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[10]  T. Graeber,et al.  Myc-driven murine prostate cancer shares molecular features with human prostate tumors. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[11]  C. Dang,et al.  MYC, Metabolism, and Cancer. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[12]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Vlfeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[13]  Patrik L. Ståhl,et al.  Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics , 2016, Science.

[14]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Gray Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2000, ECCV.

[15]  Arul M Chinnaiyan,et al.  Translating cancer genomes and transcriptomes for precision oncology , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  Adrien Depeursinge,et al.  Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Mouse models of prostate cancer: picking the best model for the question , 2014, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[18]  S. Varambally,et al.  Genomic and Epigenomic Alterations in Cancer. , 2016, The American journal of pathology.

[19]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[20]  Pichao Wang,et al.  Combining ConvNets with hand-crafted features for action recognition based on an HMM-SVM classifier , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[21]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[22]  Richard Chen,et al.  Identifying Metastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[23]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[25]  Kerstin Pingel,et al.  50 Years of Image Analysis , 2012 .

[26]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[27]  Carolina Wählby,et al.  Feature Augmented Deep Neural Networks for Segmentation of Cells , 2016, ECCV Workshops.

[28]  Leena Latonen,et al.  Benchmarking of algorithms for 3D tissue reconstruction , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[29]  M. Nykter,et al.  Feature-based analysis of mouse prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in histological tissue sections , 2016, Journal of pathology informatics.

[30]  M. Shen Faculty Opinions recommendation of Myc-driven murine prostate cancer shares molecular features with human prostate tumors. , 2003 .

[31]  Ce Zhang,et al.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features , 2016, Nature Communications.

[32]  Carlos Cordon-Cardo,et al.  Pten is essential for embryonic development and tumour suppression , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Jorma Isola,et al.  Linking Whole-Slide Microscope Images with DICOM by Using JPEG2000 Interactive Protocol , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[34]  L. Rodney Long,et al.  Histology image analysis for carcinoma detection and grading , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[35]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.