Distinct Gamma-Band Evoked Responses to Speech and Non-Speech Sounds in Humans

To understand spoken language, the human brain must have fast mechanisms for the representation and identification of speech sounds. Stimulus-induced synchronization of neural activity at gamma frequencies (20-80 Hz), occurring in humans at 200-300 msec from stimulus onset, has been suggested to be a possible mechanism for neural object representation. Auditory and visual stimuli also evoke an earlier (peak <100 msec) gamma oscillation, but its dependence on high-level stimulus parameters and, thereby, its involvement in object representation has remained unclear. Using whole-scalp magnetoencephalography, we show here that responses evoked by speech and non-speech sounds differed in the gamma-frequency but not in the low-frequency (0.1-20 Hz) band as early as 40-60 msec from stimulus onset. The gamma-band responses to the speech sound peaked earlier in the left than in the right hemisphere, whereas those to the non-speech sound peaked earlier in the right hemisphere. For the speech sound, there was no difference in the response amplitude between the hemispheres at low (20-45 Hz) gamma frequencies, whereas for the non-speech sound, the amplitude was larger in the right hemisphere. These results suggest that evoked gamma-band activity may indeed be sensitive to high-level stimulus properties and may hence reflect the neural representation of speech sounds. Consequently, speech-specific neuronal processing may commence no later than 40-60 msec from stimulus onset, possibly in the form of activation of language-specific memory traces.

[1]  O Bertrand,et al.  Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  D. Barth,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of thalamically evoked gamma oscillations in auditory cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[4]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive representations , 2001, Neuroreport.

[5]  W. Singer,et al.  Rapid feature selective neuronal synchronization through correlated latency shifting , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  S. Palva,et al.  Discrimination of Speech and of Complex Nonspeech Sounds of Different Temporal Structure in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  W. Singer,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetries of the modular structure in human temporal cortex. , 2000, Science.

[9]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Auditory cortex evoked magnetic fields and lateralization of speech processing , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  Christo Pantev,et al.  The perception of coherent and non-coherent auditory objects: a signature in gamma frequency band , 2000, Hearing Research.

[11]  C Pantev,et al.  Magnetic brain activity evoked and induced by visually presented words and nonverbal stimuli. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[12]  M. Whittington,et al.  Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Neural synchrony correlates with surface segregation rules , 2000, Nature.

[14]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Linking spontaneous activity of single cortical neurons and the underlying functional architecture. , 1999, Science.

[15]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  C. Gray.  The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration Still Alive and Well , 1999, Neuron.

[17]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[18]  P. Alku,et al.  A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[21]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Barth,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of spontaneous and thalamically evoked gamma oscillations in auditory cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[25]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory γ-Band (30–70 Hz) Activity Induced by a Visual Search Task in Humans , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[29]  D. Contreras,et al.  Synchronization of fast (30-40 Hz) spontaneous oscillations in intrathalamic and thalamocortical networks , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  B. Feige,et al.  High-frequency cortical responses reflect lexical processing: an MEG study. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Gabor filters: an informative way for analysing event-related brain activity , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  W. Singer.  Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures. , 1995, Science.

[33]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Janne Sinkkonen,et al.  The auditory transient 40‐Hz response is insensitive to changes in stimulus features , 1994, Neuroreport.

[35]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Words and pseudowords elicit distinct patterns of 30-Hz EEG responses in humans , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  J M Badier,et al.  Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  The Transient Auditory Evoked Gamma-Band Field , 1994 .

[38]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Stimulus Frequency Dependence of the Transient Oscillatory Auditory Evoked Responses (40 Hz) Studied by Electric and Magnetic Recordings in Human , 1994 .

[39]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans , 1993, Nature.

[40]  S Makeig,et al.  Human auditory evoked gamma-band magnetic fields. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.