A Tool for the Automated Design and Evaluation of Habitat Interior Layouts

The objective of space habitat design is to minimize mass and system size while providing adequate space for all necessary equipment and a functional layout that supports crew health and productivity. Unfortunately, development and evaluation of interior layouts is often ignored during conceptual design because of the subjectivity and long times required using current evaluation methods (e.g., human-in-the-loop mockup tests and in-depth CAD evaluations). Early, more objective assessment could prevent expensive design changes that may increase vehicle mass and compromise functionality. This paper describes a new interior design evaluation method to enable early, structured consideration of habitat interior layouts. This interior layout evaluation method features a comprehensive list of quantifiable habitat layout evaluation criteria, automatic methods to measure these criteria from a geometry model, and application of systems engineering tools and numerical methods to construct a multi-objective value function measuring the overall habitat layout performance. In addition to a detailed description of this method, a C++/OpenGL software tool which has been developed to implement this method is also discussed. This tool leverages geometry modeling coupled with collision detection techniques to identify favorable layouts subject to multiple constraints and objectives (e.g., minimize mass, maximize contiguous habitable volume, maximize task performance, and minimize crew safety risks). Finally, a few habitat layout evaluation examples are described to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method and tool to influence habitat design.

[1]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design , 1999 .

[2]  Marc M. Cohen,et al.  Designing Space Habitats for Human Productivity , 1990 .

[4]  M Whitmore,et al.  Habitability and performance issues for long duration space flights. , 1998, Human performance in extreme environments : the journal of the Society for Human Performance in Extreme Environments.

[5]  Danny Lobos,et al.  The problem of space layout in architecture: A survey and reflections , 2010 .

[6]  Constance M. Adams Four Legs in the Morning: Issues in Crew-Quarter Design for Long-Duration Space Facilities , 1998 .

[7]  Graham Swift,et al.  Out of this world , 1988 .

[8]  Kriss J. Kennedy,et al.  THE VERNACULAR OF SPACE ARCHITECTURE , 2002 .

[9]  S. Sathiya Keerthi,et al.  A fast procedure for computing the distance between complex objects in three-dimensional space , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Jan Osburg An interdisciplinary approach to the conceptual design of inhabited space systems , 2002 .

[11]  Michele Perchonok,et al.  Guidelines and Capabilities for Designing Human Missions , 2003 .

[12]  Umut Rifat Tuzkaya,et al.  A particle swarm optimization algorithm for the multiple-level warehouse layout design problem , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Jones Wl Habitability in long-duration space missions. , 1973 .

[14]  David Nixon Space station group activities habitability module study , 1986 .

[15]  J. Celentano,et al.  ESTABLISHING A HABITABILITY INDEX FOR SPACE STATIONS AND PLANETARY BASES , 1963 .

[16]  Gerhard Wäscher,et al.  An improved typology of cutting and packing problems , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Christer Ericson,et al.  Real-Time Collision Detection , 2004 .

[18]  Marc M. Cohen Habitat Multivariate Design Model Pilot Study , 2004 .

[19]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[20]  Peter Eckart,et al.  Spaceflight life support and biospherics , 1996 .

[21]  David Fitts International Space Station (ISS) Internal Volume Configuration (IVC) , 2002 .

[22]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[23]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  A typology of cutting and packing problems , 1990 .

[24]  Wiley J. Larson,et al.  Human spaceflight : mission analysis and design , 2007 .

[25]  David L. Akin,et al.  Minimum Functionality Lunar Habitat Element Design: Requirements and Definition of an Initial Human Establishment on the Moon , 2009 .

[26]  Raymond McCall,et al.  The New on-Line Version of the Man-Systems Integration Standards (NASA-STD-3000) , 1998 .

[27]  Gino van den Bergen,et al.  Collision Detection , 2003, Real-Time Rendering.

[28]  Richard Szabo,et al.  The Human as a System - Monitoring Spacecraft Net Habitable Volume throughout the Design Lifecycle , 2007 .

[29]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  Architecture's New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer-Aided Design , 2004 .

[30]  Kriss J. Kennedy,et al.  Constellation Architecture Team-Lunar Scenario 12.0 Habitation Overview , 2010 .

[31]  Alan W. Wilhite,et al.  Systems Level Evaluation of Space and Planetary Habitat Interior Layouts , 2010 .

[32]  Liu Fei,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization for Constrained Layout Optimization , 2004, Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04EX788).

[33]  Gino van den Bergen Collision Detection in Interactive 3D Environments , 2003 .

[34]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  A Hybrid Swarm Intelligence Based Particle Bee Algorithm for Benchmark Functions and Construction Site Layout Optimization , 2011 .

[35]  G. Rysavy Architecture and environment - Basic tools of habitability in space system design , 1971 .