Perceptual transparency from image deformation

Significance The perception of liquids, particularly water, is a vital sensory function for survival, but little is known about the visual perception of transparent liquids. Here we show that human vision has excellent ability to perceive a transparent liquid solely from dynamic image deformation. No other known image cues are needed for the perception of transparent surfaces. Static deformation is not effective for perceiving transparent liquids. Human vision interprets dynamic image deformation as caused by light refraction at the moving liquid’s surface. Transparent liquid is well perceived from artificial image deformations, which share only basic flow features with image deformations caused by physically correct light refraction. Human vision has a remarkable ability to perceive two layers at the same retinal locations, a transparent layer in front of a background surface. Critical image cues to perceptual transparency, studied extensively in the past, are changes in luminance or color that could be caused by light absorptions and reflections by the front layer, but such image changes may not be clearly visible when the front layer consists of a pure transparent material such as water. Our daily experiences with transparent materials of this kind suggest that an alternative potential cue of visual transparency is image deformations of a background pattern caused by light refraction. Although previous studies have indicated that these image deformations, at least static ones, play little role in perceptual transparency, here we show that dynamic image deformations of the background pattern, which could be produced by light refraction on a moving liquid’s surface, can produce a vivid impression of a transparent liquid layer without the aid of any other visual cues as to the presence of a transparent layer. Furthermore, a transparent liquid layer perceptually emerges even from a randomly generated dynamic image deformation as long as it is similar to real liquid deformations in its spatiotemporal frequency profile. Our findings indicate that the brain can perceptually infer the presence of “invisible” transparent liquids by analyzing the spatiotemporal structure of dynamic image deformation, for which it uses a relatively simple computation that does not require high-level knowledge about the detailed physics of liquid deformation.

[1]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Secrets of optical flow estimation and their principles , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[3]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Qasim Zaidi,et al.  Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Manish Singh,et al.  Toward a perceptual theory of transparency. , 2002, Psychological review.

[6]  B. Anderson A Theory of Illusory Lightness and Transparency in Monocular and Binocular Images: The Role of Contour Junctions , 1997, Perception.

[7]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? , 1990, Nature.

[8]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance , 2012, Current Biology.

[9]  J. Pratt,et al.  Thinking of God Moves Attention , 2010 .

[10]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[11]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[13]  S. Nishida Motion-Based Analysis of Spatial Patterns by the Human Visual System , 2004, Current Biology.

[14]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Motion transparency: making models of motion perception transparent , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  R. Fleming Visual perception of materials and their properties , 2014, Vision Research.

[16]  A. Torralba,et al.  Specular reflections and the perception of shape. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[17]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  The Visual Discrimination of Bending , 2007, Perception.

[18]  O J Braddick,et al.  Temporal Properties of the Short-Range Process in Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[19]  Naokazu Goda,et al.  Transformation from image-based to perceptual representation of materials along the human ventral visual pathway , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The art of transparency , 2011, i-Perception.

[21]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The transition in the ventral stream from feature to real-world entity representations , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[22]  Frederick Bonato,et al.  Visual/vestibular conflict, illusory self-motion, and motion sickness , 2004 .

[23]  B. Julesz,et al.  A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF ILLUSORY CONTOUR FORMATION IN STEREOPSIS , 1995 .

[24]  B. Anderson Filling-in models of completion: rejoinder to Kellman, Garrigan, Shipley, and Keane (2007) and Albert (2007). , 2007, Psychological review.

[25]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  Guy A Orban,et al.  Higher order visual processing in macaque extrastriate cortex. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[27]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Diagnostic spatial frequencies and human efficiency for discriminating actions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[28]  M. D'Zmura,et al.  Color Transparency , 1997, Perception.

[29]  Kazushi Maruya,et al.  Seeing liquids from visual motion , 2015, Vision Research.

[30]  L. Maloney,et al.  Visual Perception of Thick Transparent Materials , 2011, Psychological science.

[31]  F Metelli,et al.  The perception of transparency. , 1974, Scientific American.

[32]  A Blake,et al.  Shape from specularities: computation and psychophysics. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  Peter J Bex,et al.  (In) sensitivity to spatial distortion in natural scenes. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[34]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.