Mercury biomethylation assessment in the estuary of Bilbao (North of Spain).

The relationship between the microbial methylation of mercury and the microbial activities in sediments and water collected from the estuary of Bilbao (North of Spain) was studied in three different sampling points and in two different seasons. Three different cultures were prepared with a sediment slurry to distinguish between biotic and abiotic methylation pathways and the variations of the methylmercury concentration and the variations of the population of total number of bacteria (TDC), anaerobic heterotrophic bacteria (AHB), sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and Desulfovibrio were measured. From this work, it can be concluded that the variation of MeHg concentrations is a result of the methylation/demethylation processes in the sediments, and that the abiotic processes have a negligible contribution to those processes. According to the statistical analysis of the results (partial least squares analysis) a significant statistical correlation was established between methylmercury and the SRB counts.

[1]  R. Jahnke,et al.  Coupling mercury methylation rates to sulfate reduction rates in marine sediments , 1999 .

[2]  R. Bartha,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Anoxic Estuarine Sediment , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  H. Martens,et al.  Multivariate analysis of quality , 2000 .

[4]  H. Hintelmann,et al.  Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  G. Arana,et al.  Analysis of heavy metal distribution in superficial estuarine sediments (estuary of Bilbao, Basque Country) by open-focused microwave-assisted extraction and ICP-OES. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[6]  S. Skreslet.  Oceanography and Marine Environment of the Basque Country. Elsevier Oceanography Series 70. Edited by Á. Borja and M. Collins (2004) Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam. ISBN 0-444-51581-X. ISSN 0422–9894 (Series). , 2005 .

[7]  S. Q. Que Hee,et al.  The Environmental Geochemistry and Bioaccessibility of Mercury in Soils and Sediments: A Review , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Sources of Pollution of the Estuary of the River Nervion, Spain – A Case Study , 1984 .

[9]  A. Paschke.  Consideration of the physicochemical properties of sample matrices – an important step in sampling and sample preparation , 2003 .

[10]  J. Hobbie,et al.  Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy , 1977, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  J. Madariaga,et al.  Analytical and thermodynamical approach to understand the mobility/retention of arsenic species from the river to the estuary. The Bilbao case study , 2006 .

[12]  S. Kempe.  Estuaries - their natural and anthropogenic changes , 1988 .

[13]  R. Bartha,et al.  Metabolic Pathways Leading to Mercury Methylation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  Albrecht Paschke.  Consideration of the Physicochemical Properties of Sample Matrices—An Important Step in Sampling and Sample Preparation , 2003 .

[15]  Susan M. Miller,et al.  Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems. , 2003, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[16]  R. J. Martinez,et al.  Enumeration of sandy sediment bacteria: are the counts quantitative or relative? , 1997 .

[17]  R. Bartha,et al.  Mercury Methylation by Interspecies Hydrogen and Acetate Transfer between Sulfidogens and Methanogens , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  G. Arana,et al.  Optimisation of microwave assisted digestion of sediments and determination of Sn and Hg , 2006 .

[19]  J. Trevors,et al.  Mercury resistance and detoxification in bacteria , 1989 .

[20]  R. Atlas,et al.  Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications. , 1982 .

[21]  R. Mason,et al.  Accumulation of mercury in estuarine food chains , 1998 .

[22]  P. Visscher,et al.  Biogeochemistry of methylmercury in sediments of Long Island Sound , 2004 .

[23]  D. Lean,et al.  Abiotic methylation of mercury in the aquatic environment. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  B. Weiss,et al.  Long ago and far away: a retrospective on the implications of Minamata. , 1996, Neurotoxicology.

[25]  P. Caumette,et al.  Mercury methylation/demethylation and volatilization pathways in estuarine sediment slurries using species-specific enriched stable isotopes , 2004 .

[26]  A. Walkley,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHOD , 1934 .

[27]  A. Diego,et al.  Methylmercury determination in sediments and fish tissues from the Nerbioi-Ibaizabal estuary (Basque Country, Spain) , 2004 .

[28]  M. Verta,et al.  Mercury methylation and demethylation in aerobic surface waters , 1995 .

[29]  F. Carvalho,et al.  The IAEA worldwide intercomparison exercises (1990-1997): determination of trace elements in marine sediments and biological samples. , 1999, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  A. Cearreta,et al.  Recent Anthropogenic Impacts on the Bilbao Estuary, Northern Spain: Geochemical and Microfaunal Evidence , 2000 .

[31]  R. Bartha,et al.  Mercury Methylation and Demethylation in Anoxic Lake Sediments and by Strictly Anaerobic Bacteria , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[32]  N Etxebarria,et al.  Distribution of trace organic contaminants and total mercury in sediments from the Bilbao and Urdaibai Estuaries (Bay of Biscay). , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[33]  Amal Moulik,et al.  Trends in environmental analysis. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.