Development and validation of an automated algorithm to evaluate the abundance of bubbles in small bowel capsule endoscopy

Abstract Background and study aims Bubbles can impair visualization of the small bowel (SB) mucosa during capsule endoscopy (CE). We aimed to develop and validate a computed algorithm that would allow evaluation of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. Patients and methods Two sets of 200 SB-CE normal still frames were created. Two experienced SB-CE readers analyzed both sets of images twice, in a random order. Each still frame was categorized as presenting with < 10 % or ≥ 10 % of bubbles. Reproducibility (κ), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculation time were measured for different algorithms (Grey-level of co-occurrence matrix [GLCM], fractal dimension, Hough transform, and speeded-up robust features [SURF]) using the experts’ analysis as reference. Algorithms with highest reproducibility, Se and Sp were then selected for a validation step on the second set of frames. Criteria for validation were κ = 1, Se ≥ 90 %, Sp ≥ 85 %, and a calculation time < 1 second. Results Both SURF and GLCM algorithms had high operating points (Se and Sp over 90 %) and a perfect reproducibility (κ = 1). The validation step showed the GLCM detector strategy had the best diagnostic performances, with a Se of 95.79 %, a Sp of 95.19 %, and a calculation time of 0.037 seconds per frame. Conclusion A computed algorithm based on a GLCM detector strategy had high diagnostic performance allowing assessment of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. This algorithm could be of interest for clinical use (quality reporting) and for research purposes (objective comparison tool of different preparations).

[1]  E. Rondonotti,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: is bowel preparation still necessary in small bowel capsule endoscopy? , 2017, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[2]  Einas Abou Ali,et al.  Development and Validation of a Highly Sensitive and Highly Specific Computed Assessment of Cleansing Score for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy , 2016 .

[3]  G. Ahlenstiel,et al.  Validated computed cleansing score for video capsule endoscopy , 2016, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[4]  Anastasios Koulaouzidis,et al.  Quantitative measurements in capsule endoscopy , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[5]  G. Mantzaris,et al.  Simethicone adjunct to polyethylene glycol improves small bowel capsule endoscopy imaging in non-Crohn’s disease patients , 2015, Annals of gastroenterology.

[6]  Emanuele Rondonotti,et al.  Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline , 2015, Endoscopy.

[7]  Alexandros Karargyris,et al.  Optimizing lesion detection in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: from present problems to future solutions , 2015, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[8]  Anastasios Koulaouzidis,et al.  Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Current medical research and opinion.

[9]  J. Magalhães,et al.  Oral purgative and simethicone before small bowel capsule endoscopy. , 2013, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  Fernando Vilariño,et al.  Categorization and Segmentation of Intestinal Content Frames for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[11]  C. Mulder,et al.  Description of a novel grading system to assess the quality of bowel preparation in video capsule endoscopy , 2011, Endoscopy.

[12]  C. Liao,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of Simethicone for gastrointestinal endoscopic visibility , 2011, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  G. Costamagna,et al.  Polyethylene glycol plus simethicone in small-bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy. , 2010, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[14]  C. Daskalakis,et al.  A validation study of 3 grading systems to evaluate small-bowel cleansing for wireless capsule endoscopy: a quantitative index, a qualitative evaluation, and an overall adequacy assessment. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  Bing-ling Zhang,et al.  Effect of small bowel preparation with simethicone on capsule endoscopy , 2009, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[16]  Gheorghe Doros,et al.  The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. , 2007, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  W. Fleig,et al.  Simethicone for small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy: a systematic, single-blinded, controlled study. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[18]  P. Swain,et al.  Wireless capsule endoscopy. , 2002, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.