Renewable methane – A technology evaluation by multi-criteria decision making from a European perspective

Abstract Natural gas (NG), as one fossil fuel with multiple applications, plays a major role in Europe. However, to face global climate change and accelerate the transition to a sustainable society, fossil fuels, such as NG have to be replaced in the long term. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the technical and economic aspects of emerging technology concepts for the production of renewable methane from biomass. Biochemical and thermochemical concepts are considered within the scope of this paper. To evaluate the different conversion technologies an adapted AHP (analytic hierarchy process) was developed, based on two methods AHP and utility value analysis. In total, 99 alternatives (bio- and thermochemical conversion) were evaluated. From the multi-criteria analysis, no single technology pathway was given preference. However, the choice of substrate was found to be a critical factor in comparing the technology options. Within biochemical conversion, organic waste alternatives were favoured, for the thermochemical conversion, residual forest wood. The goal, a comprehensive comparison of two different conversion pathways on a multi-criteria scale, was achieved, and has thus provided added value for the bioeconomy and biorefinery in research and policy aspects. Further, the methodology is expandable and transferable to other criteria and technologies.

[1]  Stefan Heyne,et al.  Bio-SNG from Thermal Gasification - Process Synthesis, Integration and Performance , 2013 .

[2]  Roger Sathre,et al.  Costs and CO2 benefits of recovering, refining and transporting logging residues for fossil fuel replacement , 2011 .

[3]  J. Schulze,et al.  Influence of chemical innovations on future developments , 1970 .

[4]  V. Nkemka,et al.  Biogas production from wheat straw in batch and UASB reactors: the roles of pretreatment and seaweed hydrolysate as a co-substrate. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Xavier Dubuisson,et al.  Energy and CO2 balances in different power generation routes using wood fuel from short rotation coppice , 1998 .

[6]  Nader Padban,et al.  Ash transformations in pulverised fuel co-combustion of straw and woody biomass , 2013 .

[7]  M. Kaltschmitt,et al.  Effect of straw proportion and Ca- and Al-containing additives on ash composition and sintering of wood–straw pellets , 2013 .

[8]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass - A technology review from 1950 to 2009 , 2010 .

[9]  D. Jansen,et al.  Bio energy with CCS (BECCS): Large potential for BioSNG at low CO2 avoidance cost , 2011 .

[10]  Amornchai Arpornwichanop,et al.  Analysis of synthesis gas production with a flexible H2/CO ratio from rice straw gasification , 2016 .

[11]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Comparative analysis of wood chips and bundles - costs, carbon dioxide emissions, dry-matter losses and allergic reactions. , 2010 .

[12]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[13]  A. Faaij,et al.  International bioenergy transport costs and energy balance , 2005 .

[14]  Maria T. Johansson.  Bio-synthetic natural gas as fuel in steel industry reheating furnaces – A case study of economic performance and effects on global CO2 emissions , 2013 .

[15]  Ingwald Obernberger,et al.  Wood pellet production costs under Austrian and in comparison to Swedish framework conditions , 2004 .

[16]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi: A brief look backward and forward , 2011 .

[17]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to evaluate the natural gas energy systems , 2007 .

[18]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2001 .

[19]  François Maréchal,et al.  Combined mass and energy integration in process design at the example of membrane-based gas separation systems , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[20]  Chao Gai,et al.  Downdraft gasification of corn straw as a non-woody biomass: Effects of operating conditions on chlorides distribution , 2014 .

[21]  Persson Tobias,et al.  Biomethane: Status and Factors Affecting Market Development and Trade , 2014 .

[22]  Frank Reinicke,et al.  Basisinformationen für eine nachhaltige Nutzung von landwirtschaftlichenReststoffen zur Bioenergiebereitstellung , 2014 .

[23]  Stefan Majer,et al.  Integrated assessment of sustainable cereal straw potential and different straw-based energy applications in Germany , 2014 .

[24]  R. Matthews,et al.  Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems , 2001 .

[25]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass , 2009 .

[26]  Eric Billig,et al.  Evaluation of biomethane technologies in Europe – Technical concepts under the scope of a Delphi-Survey embedded in a multi-criteria analysis , 2016 .

[27]  Dimitri Mignard,et al.  Correlating the chemical engineering plant cost index with macro-economic indicators , 2014 .

[28]  Fredric Bauer,et al.  Biogas upgrading - Review of commercial technologies , 2013 .