Effects of Blindfolding on Verbal and Gestural Expression of Path in Auditory Motion Events

Studies have claimed that blind people’s spatial representations are different from sighted people, and blind people display superior auditory processing. Due to the nature of auditory and haptic information, it has been proposed that blind people have spatial representations that are more sequential than sighted people. Even the temporary loss of sight - such as through blindfolding - can affect spatial representations, but not much research has been done on this topic. We compared blindfolded and sighted people's linguistic spatial expressions and non-linguistic localization accuracy to test how blindfolding affects the representation of path in auditory motion events. We found that blindfolded people were as good as sighted people when localizing simple sounds, but they outperformed sighted people when localizing auditory motion events. Blindfolded people’s path related speech also included more sequential, and less holistic elements. Our results indicate that even temporary loss of sight influences spatial representations of auditory motion events.

[1]  Victor Candas,et al.  The extent of visual deficit and auditory spatial compensation: evidence from self-positioning from auditory cues. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  S Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What's communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[3]  M. Paré,et al.  Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects , 1998, Nature.

[4]  L. Talmy Lexicalisation patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms , 1985 .

[5]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  Centred Egocentric, Decentred Egocentric, and Allocentric Spatial Representations in the Peripersonal Space of Congenital Total Blindness , 2009, Perception.

[6]  J. Iverson,et al.  How to get to the cafeteria: gesture and speech in blind and sighted children's spatial descriptions. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[7]  M. Eimer Multisensory Integration: How Visual Experience Shapes Spatial Perception , 2004, Current Biology.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans , 1999, Nature.

[9]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[10]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[11]  C. Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Representation of space in blind persons: vision as a spatial sense? , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  The influence of vision on sound localization abilities in both the horizontal and vertical planes , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[14]  J. Rieser,et al.  Mental Processes Mediating Independent Travel: Implications for Orientation and Mobility , 1982 .

[15]  Victor Candas,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity to echo cues in blind subjects , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Does closing the eyes enhance auditory attention? Eye closure increases attentional alpha-power modulation but not listening performance , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  The role of visual experience on the representation and updating of novel haptic scenes , 2007, Brain and Cognition.