Enabling a Data Management System to Support the "Good Laboratory Practice"

Conducting experiments and documenting results is daily business of scientists. Documentation enables other scientists to confirm results, reassure interpretations and therefore increase the experiment's credibility. These every day action are regulated and shortly described as: "good laboratory practice". Due to computerized research systems experimental data get more elaborated, this increases the need for electronic notebooks with data storage and computational features. The aim of this thesis is to develop a new approach to substitute paper based notebooks. The new approach shall simplify the scientist's work. With the constraint, that it has to stay as evidential and credible as before. Some of the analysed requirements for laboratory notebooks are traceability of a data item, credibility of an object and preservation mechanisms. The approach of this thesis is to enable an open source data management system with necessary features for a laboratory notebook. As technologies provenance, digital signatures and secure web services are integrated into the data management system. This enriched data management system supports the scientist in his daily work which helps him to concentrate on research.

[1]  Organización Internacional de Normalización ISO 15836 : Information and documentation -- The Dublin Core metadata element set , 2009 .

[2]  Margo I. Seltzer,et al.  Choosing a Data Model and Query Language for Provenance , 2008, IPAW 2008.

[3]  Heinrich Wendel,et al.  Using Provenance to Trace Software Development Processes Statement of Affirmation , 2022 .

[4]  Michael Rubacha,et al.  A Review of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Available in the Market Today , 2011, Journal of laboratory automation.

[5]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[6]  Yogesh L. Simmhan,et al.  A survey of data provenance in e-science , 2005, SGMD.

[7]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system , 2006, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[8]  Yehuda Lindell,et al.  Introduction to Modern Cryptography , 2004 .

[9]  Yogesh L. Simmhan,et al.  The Open Provenance Model core specification (v1.1) , 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[10]  Paul C. Johannes,et al.  Beweissicheres elektronisches Laborbuch , 2013 .

[11]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.

[12]  Luc Moreau,et al.  The Foundations for Provenance on the Web , 2010, Found. Trends Web Sci..

[13]  H. Pfeifer Schreiben und Publizieren in den Naturwissenschaften , 1999 .

[14]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  An Architecture for Provenance Systems , 2006 .

[15]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  PrIMe: A methodology for developing provenance-aware applications , 2011, TSEM.

[16]  S. Drake,et al.  Dialogue concerning the Two Chief World Systems , 1954 .

[17]  Grigori Melnik,et al.  Guest Editors' Introduction: TDD--The Art of Fearless Programming , 2007, IEEE Software.

[18]  Juliana Freire,et al.  Provenance and scientific workflows: challenges and opportunities , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[19]  Lawrence Chung,et al.  Metrics for Software Adaptability , 2001 .

[20]  Yannis Cotronis,et al.  Data Provenance and Reproducibility in Grid Based Scientific Workflows , 2009, 2009 Workshops at the Grid and Pervasive Computing Conference.