Structure of a firm's knowledge base and the effectiveness of technological search

In this study, we address the issue of how firms should structure their knowledge bases. The structure of a firm’s knowledge base refers to the pattern of combinative relationships or couplings between the elements of the knowledge base. We make a distinction between coupling, a search related decision made by a firm on which knowledge elements should be combined and interdependence, the inherent relationship between knowledge elements. We argue that this distinction provides additional insights into the factors that affect technological search. Specifically, we investigate the proposition that, in contexts where interdependencies are pervasive, a nearly decomposable structure increases the usefulness of inventions by mitigating the effects of computational complexity associated with technological search and improving our knowledge about interdependencies. We also investigate the proposition that a nearly decomposable structure makes the knowledge base malleable by increasing the absorptive capacity of the firm. We find support for our hypotheses in the context of the global semiconductor industry.

[1]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[2]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[5]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[7]  Michael X Cohen The power of parallel thinking , 1981 .

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective , 1992 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[10]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[11]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON DIVERSIFICATION AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING: ENTRY, EXIT, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DURING 1981–89 , 1996 .

[12]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[13]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[14]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. , 1992 .

[15]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[16]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[17]  Corey Phelps,et al.  Small World Networks and Knowledge Creation: Implications for Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2004 .

[18]  L. Fleming Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[19]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[20]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[21]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[22]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[23]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Optimal Organization Size in a Stochastic Environment with Externalities , 1999 .

[24]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[25]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[26]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[27]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[28]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[30]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[31]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey , 1975 .

[32]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[33]  Martin H. Levinson Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2004 .

[34]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[35]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[36]  Walter Guido Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History by Walter G. Vincenti , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[37]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[38]  Philip E. Auerswald,et al.  The Production Recipes Approach to Modeling Technological Innovation: An Application to Learning by Doing , 1998 .

[39]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Robert B. Glassman,et al.  Persistence and loose coupling in living systems , 1973 .

[41]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[42]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Designs and Design Architecture: The Missing Link between 'Knowledge' and the 'Economy' , 2005 .

[43]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[44]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[45]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[46]  G. Briefs Business cycles , 1949 .

[47]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Toward Identifying the Inventive Templates of New Products: A Channeled Ideation Approach , 1999 .

[48]  Jan W. Rivkin Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[49]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[50]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[51]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[52]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[53]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[54]  A. Cameron,et al.  Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests , 1986 .

[55]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[56]  J. Hennart,et al.  Explaining the swollen middle : Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy , 1993 .

[57]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[58]  K. Palepu Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[59]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[60]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D , 1994 .

[61]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  2 Innovation in an Historical Perspective: Tales of Technology and Evolution , 2002, Technological Innovation and Economic Performance.

[62]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Optimal search on a technology landscape , 2000 .

[63]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[64]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[65]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[66]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[67]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[68]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Interdependence and Adaptability: Organizational Learning and the Long - Term Effect of Integration , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[69]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[70]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[71]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[72]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[73]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[74]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[75]  J. West Institutions, information processing, and organization structure in research and development: evidence from the semiconductor industry , 2000 .

[76]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[77]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[78]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[79]  Nicholas Argyres CAPABILITIES, TECHNOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AND DIVISIONALIZATION , 1996 .

[80]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[81]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[82]  Lori Rosenkopf BEYOND LOCAL SEARCH : BOUNDARY-SPANNING , EXPLORATION AND IMPACT IN THE OPTICAL DISC INDUSTRY Running Head : “ Beyond Local Search ” , 2000 .

[83]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[84]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[85]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .