Power and Goal Pursuit

Powerful individuals more easily acquire desired outcomes compared to powerless individuals. The authors argue that these differences can partly be attributed to self-regulation. The effects of power on the ability to act in a goal-consistent manner were analyzed across different phases of goal pursuit. Study 1 examined goal setting, Study 2 focused on the initiation of goal-directed action, Study 3 examined persistence and flexibility, and Study 4 assessed responses to good opportunities for goal pursuit and the role of implementation intentions. Consistently across studies, power facilitated prioritization and goal-consistent behavior. Power had, however, independent effects from implementation intentions. Consequences for performance are discussed.

[1]  M. Snyder,et al.  Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  E P HOLLANDER,et al.  Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. , 1958, Psychological review.

[3]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[4]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. , 1987 .

[5]  P. Gollwitzer.  The Volitional Benefits of Planning , 1996 .

[6]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  Forgetting all else: on the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[8]  S. Fiske,et al.  Minority status decreases sense of control and increases interpretive processing , 2006 .

[9]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[11]  T. Tyler,et al.  Cloaking power: Legitimizing myths and the psychology of the advantaged. , 2001 .

[12]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[13]  Richard M. Sorrentino,et al.  Commitment, conflict, and caring , 1987 .

[14]  Marius van Dijke,et al.  Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics , 2006 .

[15]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[16]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[17]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[18]  A. Guinote.  Power and the suppression of unwanted thoughts: Does control over others decrease control over the self? , 2007 .

[19]  N. Liberman,et al.  Social Motivation: Motivation and Construct Accessibility , 2004 .

[20]  J. Kuhl,et al.  Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: toward a comprehensive theory of action control. , 1984, Progress in experimental personality research.

[21]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Group size, outcome dependency, and power. Effects on perceived and actual group variability. , 2004 .

[22]  J. Terborg.  Validation and extension of an individual differences model of work performance , 1977 .

[23]  C. Judd,et al.  The Psychology of Group Perception , 2004 .

[24]  Y. Trope,et al.  Activity engagement theory: Implications of multiply identifiable input for intrinsic motivation. , 1990 .

[25]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory , 1977 .

[26]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  A Theory of Self-regulation: Action versus State Orientation, Self-discrimination, and Some Applications , 1992 .

[27]  F. Pratto,et al.  The gender gap in occupational role attainment: a social dominance approach. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  S. Fiske,et al.  Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. , 2001 .

[29]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit , 1997 .

[30]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The Naive Misuse of Power: Nonconscious Sources of Sexual Harassment , 1995 .

[31]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[32]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  The Powerholders , 1977 .

[34]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. , 2001 .

[38]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context , 1996 .

[39]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals , 2005 .

[40]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .

[41]  K. Lewin,et al.  Regression, Retrogression, and Development. , 1941 .

[42]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[43]  C. Judd,et al.  The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism , 2003 .

[44]  T. Goschke,et al.  Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. , 1993 .

[45]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  C. Judd,et al.  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  R. Sabatelli.  The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[48]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Harmon-Jones, Harmon-Jones / COGNITIVE DISSONANCE MODEL Testing the Action-Based Model of Cognitive Dissonance: The Effect of Action Orientation on Postdecisional Attitudes , 2002 .

[49]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind , 1987 .