Interspecific Variation in RGR and the Underlying Traits among 24 Grass Species Grown in Full Daylight

: A growth analysis was conducted with 24 central European grass species in full daylight to test whether traits underlying interspecific variation in relative growth rate (RGR) are the same in full daylight as they are at lower light, and whether this depends on the ecological characteristics of the studied species, i.e., their requirements with respect to nutrient and light availability. In contrast to studies with herbaceous species at lower light, net assimilation rate (NAR) contributed more than leaf area ratio (LAR) or specific leaf area (SLA) to interspecific variation in RGR. This was associated with a larger inter-specific variation in NAR than found in experiments with lower light. Without the two most shade-tolerant species, however, the contribution of LAR and its components to interspecific variation in RGR was similar or even higher than that of NAR. Leaf dry matter content correlated negatively with RGR and was the only component of LAR contributing in a similar manner to variation in LAR and RGR. There was a positive correlation between NAR and biomass allocation to roots, which may be a result of nutrient-limited growth. RGR correlated negatively with biomass allocation to leaves. Leaf thickness did not correlate with RGR, as the positive effect of thin leaves was counterbalanced by their lower NAR. Low inherent RGR was associated with species from nutrient-poor or shady habitats. Different components constrained growth for these two groups of species, those from nutrient-poor habitats having high leaf dry matter content, while those from shady habitats had thin leaves with low NAR.

[1]  P. Ryser,et al.  Ecological significance of leaf life span among Central European grass species , 2000 .

[2]  P. Ryser,et al.  Consequences of phenotypic plasticity vs. interspecific differences in leaf and root traits for acquisition of aboveground and belowground resources. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[3]  B. Shipley,et al.  Interacting components of interspecific relative growth rate: constancy and change under differing conditions of light and nutrient supply , 1999 .

[4]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  Research review. Components of leaf dry mass per area – thickness and density – alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants , 1999 .

[5]  P. Ryser,et al.  Proportional dry-mass content as an underlying trait for the variation in relative growth rate among 22 Eurasian populations of Dactylis glomerata s.l. , 1999 .

[6]  P. Reich,et al.  Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: Do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? , 1999 .

[7]  P. S. Karlsson,et al.  Leaf life span and nutrient resorption as determinants of plant nutrient conservation in temperate‐arctic regions , 1999 .

[8]  K. Thompson,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies , 1999 .

[9]  Lourens Poorter,et al.  Growth responses of 15 rain‐forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits , 1999 .

[10]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Interacting determinants of specific leaf area in 22 herbaceous species: effects of irradiance and nutrient availability , 1999 .

[11]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light , 1998 .

[12]  H. Lambers,et al.  Effects of nitrogen supply on the anatomy and chemical composition of leaves of four grass species belonging to the genus Poa, as determined by image‐processing analysis and pyrolysis–mass spectrometry , 1997 .

[13]  R. Hunt,et al.  Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species , 1997 .

[14]  S. Bassow,et al.  Intra- and inter-specific variation in canopy photosynthesis in a mixed deciduous forest , 1997, Oecologia.

[15]  Peter Ryser,et al.  The importance of tissue density for growth and life span of leaves and roots: a comparison of five ecologically contrasting grasses , 1996 .

[16]  P. Ryser,et al.  Leaf and root turnover of three ecologically contrasting grass species in relation to their performance along a productivity gradient , 1996 .

[17]  E. Garnier,et al.  Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1994 .

[18]  H. Lambers,et al.  Effects of N‐supply on the rates of photosynthesis and shoot and root respiration of inherently fast‐ and slow‐growing monocotyledonous species , 1993 .

[19]  E. Garnier.  Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1992 .

[20]  H. Poorter,et al.  Chemical composition of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate , 1992 .

[21]  R. Aerts,et al.  Nitrogen-use efficiency : a biologically meaningful definition? , 1987 .

[22]  J. P. Grime,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN THREE PERENNIAL GRASSES , 1976 .

[23]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .

[24]  G. Szeicz,et al.  SOLAR RADIATION FOR PLANT GROWTH , 1974 .

[25]  M. J. Chadwick,et al.  Experimental Investigations into the Mineral Nutrition of Several Grass Species: IV. Nitrogen Level , 1964 .

[26]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species , 1998 .

[27]  A. Werf,et al.  The importance of relative growth rate and associated traits for competition between species during vegetation succession , 1998 .

[28]  L. Poorter,et al.  Growth and carbon partitioning of tropical tree seedlings in contrasting light environments. , 1998 .

[29]  J. Virgona,et al.  Genotypic variation in relative growth rate and carbon isotope discrimination in sunflower is related to photosynthetic capacity , 1996 .

[30]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf carbon and nutrient assimilation and conservation in species of differing successional status in an oligotrophic Amazonian forest , 1995 .

[31]  F. Berendse,et al.  A comparative study of the growth and morphology of eight grass species from habitats with different nutrient availabilities. , 1993 .

[32]  R. Aerts,et al.  A simple model to explain the dominance of low-productive perennials in nutrient-poor habitats , 1993 .

[33]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[34]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[35]  F. Berendse,et al.  Competition and nutrient availability in heathland and grassland ecosystems , 1990 .

[36]  G. Evans,et al.  The quantitative analysis of plant growth , 1972 .