Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Giguere,et al. Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology.
[2] B A Schneider,et al. Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Robert C. Bilger,et al. Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .
[4] S. Abel,et al. Outer ear canal shape and its relation to the effectiveness of sound attenuating earplugs. , 1990, The Journal of otolaryngology.
[5] A D Musicant,et al. The influence of pinnae-based spectral cues on sound localization. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] A. Suter,et al. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. , 1990, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] J D Durrant,et al. Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. , 1993, American journal of audiology.
[8] Wouter A. Dreschler,et al. Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing‐impaired subjects. II , 1980 .
[9] H Kunov,et al. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection. , 1985, Scandinavian audiology.
[10] E. König,et al. Pitch discrimination and age. , 1957 .
[11] P W Alberti,et al. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.
[12] Donald C. Gasaway. Hearing conservation: A practical manual and guide , 1985 .
[13] J Zera,et al. Comparison between subjective and objective measures of active hearing protector and communication headset attenuation. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] S M Abel,et al. Sound localization: effects of reverberation time, speaker array, stimulus frequency, and stimulus rise/decay. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Wayne W. Daniel,et al. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences , 1974 .
[16] P W Alberti,et al. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Christian Giguère,et al. A multi-purpose facility for research on hearing protection , 1990 .
[18] R. Freyman,et al. Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] S. Abel,et al. Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.
[20] R. Iman,et al. Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .
[21] J W Horst. Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Daniel W. Gower,et al. Speech Intelligibility and Protective Effectiveness of Selected Active Noise Reduction and Conventional Communications Headsets , 1994, Human factors.
[23] D A Nelson,et al. Frequency discrimination in regions of normal and impaired sensitivity. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[24] Indices of Communication Handicap in Mildly Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 1993 .
[25] S. Gordon-Salant,et al. Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] W. M. Rabinowitz,et al. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.