Distance deterrence, trade barriers and accessibility. An analysis of market potential in the European Union

The interest in disentangling the role of borders in international trade is growing even within virtually borderless areas like the European Union. While there are a variety of research studies measuring how borders affect trade, there is little insight into the impact of borders on the potential accessibility to markets. The aim of this paper is twofold. First we provide a coherent calibration of the impedance parameters affecting trade (border effect based on best official data available and with a sound estimation of distance and the distance decay parameter with the use of network-based measurements). The second objective is to ascertain to what extent the market potential of different countries is hampered by the border effect. The analysis reveals that calibrating distance decay and considering border effects provides more realistic results. These results evidence that peripheral areas are more sensitive to the estimation of the distance decay parameter, whilst the main metropolitan regions are less affected by both distance decay and border effects. Finally, we present the decomposed market potential in a spillover-like matrix showing those countries that have a diversified set of contributors to their market potential and those where the number of contributors is limited.

[1]  Javier Gutiérrez,et al.  Border effect and market potential: the case of the European Union , 2014 .

[2]  Marcin Stępniak,et al.  Accessibility improvement, territorial cohesion and spillovers: a multidimensional evaluation of two motorway sections in Poland , 2013 .

[3]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  International fragmentation of production, trade and growth: Impacts and prospects for EU member states , 2013 .

[4]  John Östh,et al.  School Choice and Increasing Performance Difference: A Counterfactual Approach , 2013 .

[5]  D. Whittard,et al.  United Kingdom balance of payments: The pink book 2011 edition , 2012 .

[6]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS , 2011 .

[7]  Aura Reggiani,et al.  Accessibility and Impedance Forms: Empirical Applications to the German Commuting Network , 2011 .

[8]  A. Monzón,et al.  Assessment of Cross‐Border Spillover Effects of National Transport Infrastructure Plans: An Accessibility Approach , 2009 .

[9]  U. Deichmann,et al.  Measurement of Accessibility and Its Applications , 2009 .

[10]  Elena López,et al.  Measuring Regional Cohesion Effects of Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Investments: An Accessibility Approach , 2008 .

[11]  S. Gil‐Pareja,et al.  The Border Effect in Spain , 2005 .

[12]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[13]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  Aggregate accessibility to population at the county level: U.S. 1940–2000 , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[14]  T. Mayer,et al.  Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment in the European Union , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[15]  Natalie Chen,et al.  Intra-National Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter? , 2002 .

[16]  J. Gutiérrez Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border , 2001 .

[17]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[18]  Volker Nitsch National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union , 2000 .

[19]  H. Wolf,et al.  Intranational Home Bias in Trade , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  T. Mayer,et al.  Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU , 2000 .

[21]  Todd E. Clark,et al.  Borders and Business Cycles , 1999 .

[22]  P Rietveld,et al.  The Accessibility of European Cities: Theoretical Framework and Comparison of Approaches , 1998 .

[23]  H. Wolf Patterns of Intra- and Inter-State Trade , 1997 .

[24]  S. Wei Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? , 1996 .

[25]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the trans-European road network , 1996 .

[26]  Börje Johansson,et al.  Assessing road investments: accessibility changes, cost benefit and production effects , 1995 .

[27]  Nigel Spence,et al.  Evolution of the motorway network and changing levels of accessibility in Great Britain , 1994 .

[28]  D. Griffith What is spatial autocorrelation? Reflections on the past 25 years of spatial statistics , 1992 .

[29]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  Spatial Interaction Models:Formulations and Applications , 1988 .

[30]  Colin Clark,et al.  Industrial location and economic potential in Western Europe , 1969 .

[31]  W. G. Hansen How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[32]  C. D. Harris The, Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States , 1954 .

[33]  Taede Tillema,et al.  Distributive effects of new highway infrastructure in the Netherlands : The role of network effects and spatial spillovers , 2014 .

[34]  A. Condeço-Melhorado,et al.  Influence of distance decay on the measurement of spillover effects of transport infrastructure: a sensitivity analysis , 2013 .

[35]  Davide Fiorello,et al.  TRACC Transport Accessibility at Regional / Local Scale and Patterns in Europe , 2010 .

[36]  A. Condeço-Melhorado,et al.  Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment , 2010 .

[37]  L. Vettoretto,et al.  The European Spatial Development Perspective , 2008 .

[38]  Adelheid Holl Transport Network Development and the Location of Economic Activity , 2007 .

[39]  Klaus Spiekermann,et al.  European Accessibility and Peripherality: Concepts, Models and Indicators , 2002 .

[40]  T. Mayer,et al.  Illusory Border Effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade , 2002 .

[41]  Roger Bivand,et al.  A review of spatial statistical techniques for location studies , 1998 .

[42]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[43]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  GIS and Models of Accessibility Potential: An Application in Planning , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[44]  D. Keeble,et al.  Peripheral regions in a community of twelve member states , 1988 .

[45]  J. H. Schuenemeyer,et al.  Statistical Methods For Geographers , 1986 .

[46]  K. Haynes,et al.  Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models , 1985 .

[47]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The Geographical Distribution of Crop Productivity in England , 1939 .