Continuous Presence in Collaborative Virtual Environments: Towards a Hybrid Avatar-Agent Model for User Representation

This paper is concerned with the evaluation of user embodiments in educational collaborative virtual environments by exploring an important aspect of interaction in virtual environments, namely the degree of 'presence' experienced by participants. Firstly, the influence of different avatar styles is examined using a specially designed prototype virtual art gallery. The choice of experimental procedure, together with analysis and interpretation of the results are presented and discussed. A second possible factor influencing presence, namely the continuous representation of users is examined within the same prototype environment, but this time using a hybrid avatar-agent model featuring an animated conversational agent to control the avatar during absence of its underlying user. The consequences of continuous presence in a collaborative virtual environment, particularly in respect of possible benefits for learning environments, are discussed and a forthcoming set of experiments to evaluate the effect of such an agent on users' experience of presence is outlined.

[1]  D Thalmann,et al.  Artificial Life and VirtualReality , 1994 .

[2]  P. Maes,et al.  Artificial life meets entertainment : lifelike autonomous agents : New horizons in commercial and industrial AI , 1995 .

[3]  James C. Lester,et al.  The pedagogical design studio: exploiting artifact-based task models for constructivist learning , 1997, IUI '97.

[4]  A. Huxor The Role of 3D Shared Worlds in Support of Chance Encounters in CSCW , 1999 .

[5]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[6]  James C. Lester,et al.  Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[7]  Joseph Psotka,et al.  Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training , 1995 .

[8]  Mervyn A. Jack,et al.  Experimental assessment of the effectiveness of synthetic personae for multi-modal e-retail applications , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[9]  Mel Slater,et al.  Presence in immersive virtual environments , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[10]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational interface agents , 2000, CACM.

[11]  Clark Elliott,et al.  Autonomous Agents as Synthetic Characters , 1998, AI Mag..

[12]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Integrating reactive and scripted behaviors in a life-like presentation agent , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[15]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Interactive Simulation Environments , 1995, AI Mag..

[16]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  On Selecting the Right Yardstick , 1999, Presence.

[17]  Tom Carey,et al.  Human-computer interaction , 1994 .

[18]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents , 1995, CACM.

[19]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[20]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[21]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.