Shared Driving Control between Human and Autonomous Driving System via Conflict resolution using Non-Cooperative Game Theory

Shared driving control between human driver and autonomous driving system (AutoSys) is very significant with respect to its contribution to the field of ADAS. In this paper, we present a shared driving methodology through the fusion of the individual driving inputs of human driver and AutoSys, which computes the final driving input for the vehicle. This is achieved through the conflict resolution between the two drivers using non-cooperative game theory. The methodology of the fusion process is based on some features like driving decision admissibility (related to collision risk assessment), future predictions of driving profiles, individual driving intentions comparison (based on a similarity measure method) that are described in the article. A two player non-cooperative game is defined incorporating the driving admissibility and intentions. Conflict resolution is achieved through an optimal bargaining solution given by Nash Equilibrium. The validation is carried out on a driving simulator integrated with the softwares like IPG CarMaker and Simulink. The results for various driving scenarios are presented.

[1]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Architectures for Shared Control of Vehicle Steering , 2016 .

[2]  Yunfeng Hu,et al.  Hazard-evaluation-based Driver-automation Switched Shared Steering Control for Intelligent Vehicles , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[3]  Chunshi Guo,et al.  MPC-based shared steering control for automated driving systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[4]  Agnieszka Rusinowska,et al.  Axiomatic and Strategic Approaches to Bargaining Problems , 2003, Theory and Applications of Relational Structures as Knowledge Instruments.

[5]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Safe Nonlinear Trajectory Generation for Parallel Autonomy With a Dynamic Vehicle Model , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Shared Control Driver Assistance System Based on Driving Intention and Situation Assessment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Pongsathorn Raksincharoensak,et al.  Shared Control in Risk Predictive Braking Maneuver for Preventing Collisions With Pedestrians , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[8]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Analysis of Human-Machine Cooperation When Driving with Different Degrees of Haptic Shared Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[9]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Shared control of autonomous vehicles based on velocity space optimization , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[10]  Sören Hohmann,et al.  Cooperative longitudinal driver assistance system based on shared control , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[11]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Exploring shared control in automated driving , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Kimihiko Nakano,et al.  Driver-Automation Shared Control: Modeling Driver Behavior by Taking Account of Reliance on Haptic Guidance Steering , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[14]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[15]  Alessandro Victorino,et al.  Grid based Estimation of Decision Uncertainty of Autonomous Driving Systems using Belief Function theory , 2018 .

[16]  Mara Tanelli,et al.  A weighting approach to the shared-control of lateral vehicle dynamics , 2018 .

[17]  Matteo Corno,et al.  Shared control for road departure prevention , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.