Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a three-dimensional (3D) x-ray imaging modality that reconstructs image slices parallel to the detector plane. Image acquisition is performed using a limited angular range (less than 50 degrees) and a limited number of projection views (less than 50 views). Due to incomplete data sampling, image artifacts are unavoidable in DBT. In this preliminary study, the image artifacts in DBT were investigated systematically using a linear system approximation. A cascaded linear system model of DBT was developed to calculate the 3D presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) with different image acquisition geometries and reconstruction filters using a filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm. A thin, slanted tungsten (W) wire was used to measure the presampling MTF of the DBT system in the cross-sectional plane defined by the thickness (z-) and tube travel (x-) directions. The measurement was in excellent agreement with the calculation using the model. A small steel bead was used to calculate the artifact spread function (ASF) of the DBT system. The ASF was correlated with the convolution of the two-dimensional (2D) point spread function (PSF) of the system and the object function of the bead. The results showed that the cascaded linear system model can be used to predict the magnitude of image artifacts of small, high-contrast objects with different image acquisition geometry and reconstruction filters.

[1]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[2]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[3]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Theoretical framework for filtered back projection in tomosynthesis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[5]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[6]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  High-speed large angle mammography tomosynthesis system , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  L Desponds,et al.  Image quality index (IQI) for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  P Haaker,et al.  A new digital tomosynthesis method with less artifacts for angiography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[9]  S. Taplin,et al.  Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  G Panayiotakis,et al.  A method for selective removal of out-of-plane structures in digital tomosynthesis. , 1993, Medical physics.

[11]  R A Kruger,et al.  Selective plane removal in limited angle tomographic imaging. , 1985, Medical physics.

[12]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of detector operation and imaging geometry for breast tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Baojun Li,et al.  Optimization of slice sensitivity profile for radiographic tomosynthesis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[15]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[16]  A. Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Self-masking subtraction tomosynthesis. , 1984, Radiology.

[17]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[19]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  D. Kopans,et al.  Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Renuka Uppaluri,et al.  Measurement of slice thickness and in-plane resolution on radiographic tomosynthesis system using modulation transfer function (MTF) , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  M F Kijewski,et al.  The noise power spectrum of CT images. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Renuka Uppaluri,et al.  Effect of acquisition parameters on image quality in digital tomosynthesis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.