Proliferation Saturation Index in an adaptive Bayesian approach to predict patient-specific radiotherapy responses

Purpose Radiotherapy prescription dose and dose fractionation protocols vary little between individual patients having the same tumor grade and stage. To personalize radiotherapy a predictive model is needed to simulate radiation response. Previous modeling attempts with multiple variables and parameters have been shown to yield excellent data fits at the cost of nonidentifiability and clinically unrealistic results. Materials and Methods We develop a mathematical model based on a proliferation saturation index (PSI) that is a measurement of pre-treatment tumor volume-to-carrying capacity ratio that modulates intrinsic tumor growth and radiation response rates. In an adaptive Bayesian approach, we utilize an increasing number of data points for individual patients for predicting response to subsequent radiation doses. Results Model analysis shows that using PSI as the only patient-specific parameter, model simulations can fit longitudinal clinical data with high accuracy (R2=0.84). By analyzing tumor response to radiation using daily CT scans early in the treatment, response to the remaining treatment fractions can be predicted after two weeks with high accuracy (c-index=0.89). Conclusion The PSI model may be suited to forecast treatment response for individual patients and offer actionable decision points for mid-treatment protocol adaptation. The presented work provides an actionable image-derived biomarker prior to and during therapy to personalize and adapt radiotherapy.

[1]  S. F. C. O’Rourke,et al.  Linear quadratic and tumour control probability modelling in external beam radiotherapy , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  Rajesh Jena,et al.  Modelling and Bayesian adaptive prediction of individual patients’ tumour volume change during radiotherapy , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  G. Sandison,et al.  Ill-posed problem and regularization in reconstruction of radiobiological parameters from serial tumor imaging data , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  L. Hlatky,et al.  Acute and fractionated irradiation differentially modulate glioma stem cell division kinetics. , 2013, Cancer research.

[5]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  The Importance of Spatial Distribution of Stemness and Proliferation State in Determining Tumor Radioresponse , 2009 .

[6]  Philip Gerlee,et al.  The model muddle: in search of tumor growth laws. , 2012, Cancer research.

[7]  F. Harrell,et al.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests. , 1982, JAMA.

[8]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and treatment. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[9]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Prediction of Treatment Response for Combined Chemo- and Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using a Bio-Mathematical Model , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology. , 2015, Cancer research.

[11]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: a dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy. , 1999, Cancer research.

[12]  John M. L. Ebos,et al.  Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  J. Torres-Roca,et al.  A molecular assay of tumor radiosensitivity: a roadmap towards biology-based personalized radiation therapy. , 2012, Personalized medicine.

[14]  N. Mayr,et al.  Assessment of interpatient heterogeneity in tumor radiosensitivity for nonsmall cell lung cancer using tumor-volume variation data. , 2014, Medical physics.

[15]  Eddie Barendsen,et al.  21 years of Biologically Effective Dose , 2022 .

[16]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[17]  M. Peruggia Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[18]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  Kristin R. Swanson,et al.  Toward Patient-Specific, Biologically Optimized Radiation Therapy Plans for the Treatment of Glioblastoma , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  D. Coppola,et al.  Personalizing Gastric Cancer Screening With Predictive Modeling of Disease Progression Biomarkers , 2017, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[21]  R. Schreiber,et al.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[22]  J. Freyer,et al.  Regulation of growth saturation and development of necrosis in EMT6/Ro multicellular spheroids by the glucose and oxygen supply. , 1986, Cancer research.

[23]  Ping Xia,et al.  Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Kujtim Latifi,et al.  Predicting Patient-Specific Radiotherapy Protocols Based on Mathematical Model Choice for Proliferation Saturation Index , 2018, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[25]  I. Chetty,et al.  Impact of fraction size on lung radiation toxicity: hypofractionation may be beneficial in dose escalation of radiotherapy for lung cancers. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Slav Yartsev,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy planning on decreasing gross tumor volumes as seen on megavoltage computed tomography images. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  K Hendrickson,et al.  Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Kujtim Latifi,et al.  A proliferation saturation index to predict radiation response and personalize radiotherapy fractionation , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[29]  W. Tomé,et al.  Systematic Review of Normal Tissue Complication Models Relevant to Standard Fractionation Radiation Therapy of the Head and Neck Region Published After the QUANTEC Reports. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.