Unrelated helpers in a social insect

High-resolution genetic markers have revolutionized our understanding of vertebrate mating systems, but have so far yielded few comparable surprises about kinship in social insects. Here we use microsatellite markers to reveal an unexpected and unique social system in what is probably the best-studied social wasp, Polistes dominulus. Social insect colonies are nearly always composed of close relatives; therefore, non-reproductive helping behaviour can be favoured by kin selection, because the helpers aid reproductives who share their genes. In P. dominulus, however, 35% of foundress nestmates are unrelated and gain no such advantage. The P. dominulus system is unlike all other cases of unrelated social insects, because one individual has nearly complete reproductive dominance over subordinates who could have chosen other reproductive options. The only significant advantage that subordinates obtain is a chance at later reproduction, particularly if the queen dies. Thus, P. dominulus societies are functionally unlike other social insects, but similar to certain vertebrate societies, in which the unrelated helpers gain through inheritance of a territory or a mate.

[1]  C. Hughes INTEGRATING MOLECULAR TECHNIQUES WITH FIELD METHODS IN STUDIES OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: A REVOLUTION RESULTS , 1998 .

[2]  L. Keller Queen number and sociality in insects , 1993 .

[3]  Joan D. Ferraris,et al.  Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocols , 1997 .

[4]  Janice E. Ragsdale Reproductive skew theory extended: The effect of resource inheritance on social organization , 1999 .

[5]  D. Queller,et al.  Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[6]  P. J. B. Slater,et al.  Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology Edited by Bert Hölldobler & Martin Lindauer. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer (1985). Pp. xiv+488. Price DM 148.00 , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Trinucleotide microsatellite loci in a swarm‐founding neotropical wasp, Parachartergus colobopterus and their usefulness in other social wasps , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[8]  J. Strassmann,et al.  KIN SELECTION AND SOCIAL INSECTS , 1998 .

[9]  S. Vehrencamp Optimal Degree of Skew in Cooperative Societies , 1983 .

[10]  D. Pfennig,et al.  The evolution and ontogeny of nestmate recognition in social wasps , 1986 .

[11]  Robert W. Matthews,et al.  The social biology of wasps. , 1991 .

[12]  S. Creel,et al.  Inclusive fitness and reproductive strategies in dwarf mongooses , 1994 .

[13]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Genetic relatedness in primitively eusocial wasps , 1989, Nature.

[14]  David E. J. Jones,et al.  World enough and time , 1989, Nature.

[15]  L PARDI,et al.  Dominance Order in Polistes Wasps , 1948, Physiological Zoology.

[16]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  H. Reyer Investment and relatedness: A cost/benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis) , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  N. Franks,et al.  Social Evolution in Ants , 2019 .

[22]  G. B. Pollock,et al.  Foraging specialization without relatedness or dominance among co-founding ant queens , 1989, Nature.

[23]  R. Crozier,et al.  Genetic Intrigues. (Book Reviews: Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Sex Allocation and Kin Selection.) , 1997 .

[24]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Trinucleotide microsatellite loci for a social wasp, Polistes , 1997, Molecular ecology.