Modelling and Measuring Scientific Production: Results for a Panel of OECD Countries

This paper presents results from employing an econometric approach to examine the determinants of scientific production at cross-country level. The aim of this paper is not to provide accurate and robust estimates of investment elasticities (a doubtful task given the poor quality of the data sources and the modelling problems), but to develop and critically assess the validity of an empirical approach for characterising the production of science and its impact from a comparative perspective. We employ and discuss the limitations of a production function approach to relate investment inputs to scientific outputs using a sample of 14 countries for which we have information about Higher Education Research and Development (HERD). The outputs are taken from the Thomson ISI® National Science Indicators (2002) database on published papers and citations. The inputs and outputs for this sample of countries have been recorded for a period of 21 years (1981-2002). A thorough discussion of data shortcomings is presented in this paper. On the basis of this panel dataset we investigate the profile of the time lag between the investment in HERD and the research output and the returns to national investment in science. We devote particular attention to analysis of the presence of cross-country spillovers. We show their relevance and underline the international effect of the US system.

[1]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[2]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[3]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? , 2001 .

[4]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  How large is the Swedish ‘academic’ sector really?: A critical analysis of the use of science and technology indicators , 2004 .

[5]  S. Brusoni,et al.  The economic returns to Basic Research and the Benefits of University-Industry Relationships , 2001 .

[6]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity , 2003 .

[7]  T. Klette,et al.  Accumulation of R&D Capital and Dynamic Firm Performance: a Not-so-Fixed Effect Model , 1998 .

[8]  F. Fisher,et al.  Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know , 2003 .

[9]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[10]  Warwick Lightfoot,et al.  The sources of economic growth in OECD countries , 2004 .

[11]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Research Funding and Performance in U.K. University Departments of Economics: A Frontier Analysis. , 1995 .

[13]  James D. Adams,et al.  Research Productivity in a System of Universities , 1996 .

[14]  Franklin M. Fisher,et al.  The Existence of Aggregate Production Functions , 1969 .

[15]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[16]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[17]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[18]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Economics of Knowledge Production , 1999 .

[19]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[20]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[21]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  R&D and productivity growth: a panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries , 2001 .