Rationalization and Incomplete Information

We analyze a family of extensive-form solution procedures for games with incomplete information that do not require the specification of an epistemic type space a la Harsanyi, but can accommodate a (commonly known) collection of explicit restrictions D on first-order beliefs. For any fixed D we obtain a solution called D-rationalizability.In static games, D-rationalizability characterizes the set of outcomes (combinations of payoff types and strategies) that may occur in any Bayesian equilibrium model consistent with D; these are precisely the outcomes consistent with common certainty of rationality and of the restrictions D. Hence, our approach to the analysis of incomplete-information games is consistent with Harsanyi's, and it may be viewed as capturing the robust implications of Bayesian equilibrium analysis.In dynamic games, D-rationalizability yields a forward-induction refinement of this set of Bayesian equilibrium outcomes. Focusing on the restriction that first-order beliefs be consistent with a given distribution on terminal nodes, we obtain a refinement of self-confirming equilibrium. In signalling games, this refinement coincides with the Iterated Intuitive Criterion.

[1]  Yossi Feinberg,et al.  Characterizing Common Priors in the Form of Posteriors , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[2]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria , 1987 .

[3]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Rationality and knowledge in game theory , 1997 .

[4]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria , 1987 .

[5]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Strong Belief and Forward Induction Reasoning , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[6]  Elchanan Ben-Porath,et al.  Rationality, Nash Equilibrium and Backwards Induction in Perfect-Information Games , 1997 .

[7]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Payoff Information and Self-Confirming Equilibrium , 1999 .

[8]  F. Forges,et al.  Five legitimate definitions of correlated equilibrium in games with incomplete information , 1993 .

[9]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  Rationalizable Conjectural Equilibrium: Between Nash and Rationalizability , 1994 .

[10]  Giacomo Bonanno,et al.  How to make sense of the common prior assumption under incomplete information , 1999, Int. J. Game Theory.

[11]  Matthew Rabin,et al.  Incorporating Behavioral Assumptions into Game Theory , 1992 .

[12]  D. Bergemann,et al.  Robust Mechanism Design , 2003 .

[13]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Conjectural Equilibria and Rationalizability in a Game with Incomplete Information , 1997 .

[14]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  On 'Reputation' Refinements with Heterogeneous Beliefs , 1997 .

[15]  Eddie Dekel,et al.  Hierarchies of Beliefs and Common Knowledge , 1993 .

[16]  E. Kalai,et al.  Subjective Games and Equilibria , 1993 .

[17]  Philip J. Reny,et al.  A general solution to King Solomon's dilemma , 1999 .

[18]  D. Samet Common Priors and Separation of Convex Sets , 1998 .

[19]  S. Morris The Common Prior Assumption in Economic Theory , 1995, Economics and Philosophy.

[20]  S. Zamir,et al.  Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information , 1985 .

[21]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Self-confirming equilibrium , 1993 .

[22]  B. Bernheim Rationalizable Strategic Behavior , 1984 .

[23]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Strategic Rationality Orderings and the Best Rationalization Principle , 1996 .

[24]  David Pearce Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection , 1984 .

[25]  Lars Stole,et al.  Fixed-equilibrium rationalizability in signaling games , 1990 .

[26]  Eddie Dekel,et al.  Rationalizable Outcomes of Large Independent Private-Value First-Price Discrete Auctions , 2000 .

[27]  Marciano M. Siniscalchi,et al.  Hierarchies of Conditional Beliefs and Interactive Epistemology in Dynamic Games , 1999 .

[28]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Rationalizability in Incomplete Information Games , 1999 .

[29]  D. Samet Iterated Expectations and Common Priors , 1998 .

[30]  E. Kohlberg Refinement of Nash Equilibrium: The Main Ideas , 1990 .

[31]  E. Kalai,et al.  Subjective Equilibrium in Repeated Games , 1993 .

[32]  A. Rényi On a new axiomatic theory of probability , 1955 .

[33]  R. Aumann Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality Author ( s ) , 1987 .

[34]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[35]  T. Tan,et al.  The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games , 1988 .

[36]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Rationalizable bidding in first-price auctions , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[37]  Joel Watson,et al.  A ‘Reputation’ Refinement without Equilibrium , 1993 .

[38]  Eddie Dekel,et al.  Rationalizable outcomes of large private-value first-price discrete auctions , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[39]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Learning to Play Bayesian Games , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[40]  Philip J. Reny,et al.  BACKWARD INDUCTION, NORMAL FORM PERFECTION , 1992 .

[41]  Faruk Gul A Comment on Aumann's Bayesian View , 1998 .

[42]  Joel Watson,et al.  Conditional Dominance, Rationalizability, and Game Forms , 1997 .

[43]  Robert J. Weber,et al.  Distributional Strategies for Games with Incomplete Information , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[44]  P. Reny Backward Induction, Normal Form Perfection and Explicable Equilibria , 1992 .

[45]  J. Friedman Problems of Coordination in Economic Activity , 1994 .

[46]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Strategic Information Revelation , 1990 .