Parts, Partonomies, and Taxonomies.

Partonomies, such as body parts, like taxonomies, such as the animal kingdom, are hierarchical organizations of knowledge based on an asymmetric, transitive relation, part of or kind of. This article reports exploratory work on children's partonomic knowledge, and the relation between partonomic knowledge and use of taxonomic organization. Because parts are elements of both appearance and function, shared parts may facilitate the transition from classification based on perception to classification based on function. Children were more likely to group taxonomically when instances shared parts than when instances did not share parts. For adults, parts rated "good" are functionally significant as well as perceptually salient, for example, the seat of a chair. Perceptually salient parts— those affecting shape or large ones—were detected faster by younger children than were less salient parts.

[1]  H. Hock,et al.  Perceptual units in the acquisition of visual categories. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[3]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[4]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[5]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[6]  I. Biederman.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[7]  Cecil H. Brown.  general principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature1 , 1976 .

[8]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Components and Categorization , 1986 .

[10]  C. Richard Puff,et al.  Memory Organization and Structure , 1979 .

[11]  B. Tversky,et al.  Categories of environmental scenes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[13]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Advances in developmental psychology , 1981 .

[14]  C. Mervis,et al.  Acquisition of basic object categories , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  S. Palmer.  Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  B. Tversky,et al.  Objects, parts, and categories. , 1984 .

[17]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[19]  B. Tversky,et al.  Developmental trends in the use of perceptual and conceptual attributes in grouping, clustering, and retrieval. , 1981, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[21]  S. Petrey,et al.  Word associations and the development of lexical memory , 1977, Cognition.

[22]  J. Bruner,et al.  Studies In Cognitive Growth , 1966 .

[23]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[25]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[26]  R. Willis,et al.  The Anthropology of the Body , 1978 .

[27]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[28]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The perception and recognition of complex figures , 1972 .

[29]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Development of taxonomic organization of named and pictured categories. , 1985 .

[30]  Marion Perlmutter,et al.  The Leg Bone Is Connected to the Knee Bone: Children's Representation of Body Parts in Memory, Drawing, and Language. , 1979 .

[31]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[32]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[33]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age ☆ , 1979 .

[35]  G. Bower,et al.  Structural units and the redintegrative power of picture fragments. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[36]  John B. Black,et al.  The representation of scripts in memory , 1985 .

[37]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Basic-level superiority in picture categorization , 1982 .

[38]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.