Fiscal Decentralization and Human Development in Selected Developing Countries in Asia: Role of Institutionali

The paper aims to investigate the impact of fiscal decentralization on human development and moderating role of political institutions in selected Asian countries for the time period 1990-2019, applying panel data Fixed and Random Effects models. The empirical findings show that fiscal decentralization at both the provincial and local levels significantly affects human development. The optimal level of fiscal decentralization is computed at 1.143 and 0.229, respectively, suggesting that fiscal decentralization above this level may revert the results for human development. The non-linear specification of the model also portrays a rising human development in the wake of fiscal decentralization but at a decreasing rate. Moreover, the role of institutionalization is proved effective in the case of the countries where provincial-level decentralization is controlled in the model. The results imply that a lack of proper coordination and mismanagement due to many governance tiers can subside human development. However, fiscal decentralization is an essential factor for Asian countries to increase the efficiency of the public sector if supported with a controlled decentralization at the sub-national level.JEL Classification: H50, H70, O15

[1]  Eatzaz Ahmad,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE, GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH , 2020 .

[2]  M. Pasichnyi,et al.  The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Development , 2019, Investment Management and Financial Innovations.

[3]  Zaid Shelleh.  Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Institutional Quality: Evidence from Developing Countries , 2017 .

[4]  A. S. Lodhi,et al.  Impact of Fiscal Decentralizations on Education and Healthcare Outcomes: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan , 2016 .

[5]  N. Iqbal,et al.  Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Role of Democratic Institutions , 2012 .

[6]  E. Akpan.  Fiscal Decentralization and Social Outcomes in Nigeria , 2011 .

[7]  Jorge Martínez-Vázquez,et al.  The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization: Issues in Theory and Challenges in Practice , 2011 .

[8]  Andreas P. Kyriacou,et al.  Fiscal and Political Decentralization and Government Quality , 2011 .

[9]  J. Tranchant.  Fiscal decentralisation, institutional quality and ethnic conflict: A panel data analysis, 1985–2001 , 2008 .

[10]  E. Zhuravskaya,et al.  Decentralization and Political Institutions , 2003 .

[11]  F. Stewart,et al.  Decentralization and Human Development in Argentina , 2003 .

[12]  K. Thurmaier,et al.  Beyond Efficiency and Economy: An Examination of Basic Needs and Fiscal Decentralization , 2002, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[13]  Kerk L. Phillips,et al.  Fiscal decentralisation and IDC economic growth: An empirical investigation , 1998 .

[14]  R. Prud’homme.  The dangers of decentralization , 1995 .

[15]  R. Bird.  Decentralization of the socialist state : intergovernmental finance in transition economies , 1995 .

[16]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Mobilization, Political Institutions, and Political Violence , 1971 .

[17]  David G. Davies,et al.  The Theory of Public Finance , 1960 .

[18]  A. Azam,et al.  Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in South Asian countries , 2019 .

[19]  R. Bird.  Fiscal federalism , 2019, Federalism in China and Russia.

[20]  Peter Silas Mwiathi.  Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Poverty Reduction Outcomes, Income Inequalities and Human Development in Kenya , 2017 .

[21]  Tasneem Sikander.  Political Development and Political Decay , 2015 .

[22]  E. Udoh,et al.  Fiscal decentralization, economic growth and human resource development in Nigeria: Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach , 2015 .

[23]  E. H. Kim,et al.  Current Draft : August , 2002 First Draft : April , 2002 Comments welcome To Steal or Not to Steal : Firm Attributes , Legal Environment , and Valuation Art Durnev , 2002 .