Establishing Multiscale Models for Simulating Whole Limb Estimates of Electric Fields for Osseointegrated Implants

Although the survival rates of warfighters in recent conflicts are among the highest in military history, those who have sustained proximal limb amputations may present additional rehabilitation challenges. In some of these cases, traditional prosthetic limbs may not provide adequate function for service members returning to an active lifestyle. Osseointegration has emerged as an acknowledged treatment for those with limited residual limb length and those with skin issues associated with a socket together. Using this technology, direct skeletal attachment occurs between a transcutaneous osseointegrated implant (TOI) and the host bone, thereby eliminating the need for a socket. While reports from the first 100 patients with a TOI have been promising, some rehabilitation regimens require 12-18 months of restricted weight bearing to prevent overloading at the bone-implant interface. Electrically induced osseointegration has been proposed as an option for expediting periprosthetic fixation and preliminary studies have demonstrated the feasibility of adapting the TOI into a functional cathode. To assure safe and effective electric fields that are conducive for osseoinduction and osseointegration, we have developed multiscale modeling approaches to simulate the expected electric metrics at the bone--implant interface. We have used computed tomography scans and volume segmentation tools to create anatomically accurate models that clearly distinguish tissue parameters and serve as the basis for finite element analysis. This translational computational biological process has supported biomedical electrode design, implant placement, and experiments to date have demonstrated the clinical feasibility of electrically induced osseointegration.

[1]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Current insights into the formation and breakdown of hemidesmosomes. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[2]  H. Soong,et al.  Movements of cultured corneal epithelial cells and stromal fibroblasts in electric fields. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Osseointegration of bone implants. A review of an alternative mode of fixation. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  Brad M Isaacson,et al.  Effectiveness of resonance frequency in predicting orthopedic implant strength and stability in an in vitro osseointegration model. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Risk of failure during gait for direct skeletal attachment of a femoral prosthesis: a finite element study. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  J. P. Beck,et al.  Bioelectric analyses of an osseointegrated intelligent implant design system for amputees. , 2009, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Brad M Isaacson,et al.  Bone bioelectricity: what have we learned in the past 160 years? , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  Clayton J Adam,et al.  FE stress analysis of the interface between the bone and an osseointegrated implant for amputees--implications to refine the rehabilitation program. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Brad M Isaacson,et al.  Developing a Quantitative Measurement System for Assessing Heterotopic Ossification and Monitoring the Bioelectric Metrics from Electrically Induced Osseointegration in the Residual Limb of Service Members , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Gf Odland,et al.  The structure of the skin , 1991 .

[11]  Nicole J. Crane,et al.  Heterotopic ossification following combat-related trauma. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Hannah Fischer,et al.  American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics [Updated July 13, 2005] , 2005 .

[13]  J. Mercola,et al.  The Basis for Micro Current Electrical Therapy in Conventional Medical Practice , 2011 .

[14]  Donald Gajewski,et al.  The United States Armed Forces Amputee Patient Care Program , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[15]  Hannah Fischer,et al.  U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom , 2013 .

[16]  B. Prilutsky,et al.  Mathematical modeling and mechanical and histopathological testing of porous prosthetic pylon for direct skeletal attachment. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  Mark Pitkin,et al.  On the way to total integration of prosthetic pylon with residuum. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  J. P. Beck,et al.  The road to recovery and rehabilitation for injured service members with limb loss: a focus on Iraq and Afghanistan. , 2010, U.S. Army Medical Department journal.

[19]  J. P. Beck,et al.  An evaluation of electrical stimulation for improving periprosthetic attachment. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[20]  K. Hagberg,et al.  One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses--rehabilitation perspective. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  K. Hagberg,et al.  Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: Prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.