Analyzing Capacity Development Approaches in CSR Implementation and Their Societal Impact: A Case Study of ITC’s E-Choupal

This paper examines capacity development for collective action and institutional change through implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives in Indian context. Capacity development for collective action focuses on creating and strengthening capacities that represent the potential for collaborative response to social problems. Framework developed by Rama et al. (2009) has been used to study Collective Action Model (CAM) integrated with capacity development approaches to study CSR implementation and its impact in the context of ITC’s e-chaupal (India). ITC’s e-chaupal has been instrumental in development of individual and organizational capacity, collaborative capacity in enabling environment. This case is pertinent to CSR initiatives in rural development projects. The case shows a good fit to the framework and highlights multi-stakeholder collaborations for an enabling environment and development at grassroots. Framework based analysis is useful, as it enables practitioners and researchers to develop an integrated view of CSR implementation.

[1]  P Healey,et al.  Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning , 1998 .

[2]  Bernard J. Milano,et al.  CSR Implementation: Developing the Capacity for Collective Action , 2009 .

[3]  R. Zakocs,et al.  What Coalition Factors Foster Community Capacity? Lessons Learned From the Fighting Back Initiative , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[4]  John L. Campbell WHERE DO WE STAND? COMMON MECHANISMS IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS RESEARCH , 2005 .

[5]  R. Chaskin Building Community Capacity , 2001 .

[6]  David W. Lounsbury,et al.  Building Collaborative Capacity in Community Coalitions: A Review and Integrative Framework , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[7]  R M Goodman,et al.  Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. , 1993, Health education research.

[8]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  In pursuit of comparable concepts and data about collective action , 2004, Agricultural Systems.

[9]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  A Theory of Systems Evaluation , 2006 .

[10]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity , 2003 .

[11]  C. Lusthaus,et al.  Capacity Development: Definitions, Issues and Implications for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation , 1999 .

[12]  Craig Smith The new corporate philanthropy , 1994 .

[13]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements , 1997 .

[14]  E. Ford,et al.  Community-Based Coalitions’ Capacity for Sustainable Action: The Role of Relationships , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[15]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[16]  Ruth Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Methods for studying collective action in rural development , 2004 .