The More Cooperation, the More Competition? A Cournot Analysis of the Benefits of Electric Market Coupling

Market coupling in Belgian and Dutch markets would permit more efficient use of intercountry transmission, 1) by counting only net flows against transmission limits, 2) by improving access to the Belgian market, and 3) by eliminating the mismatch in timing between interface auctions and the energy spot market. A Cournot market model that accounts for the region’s transmission pricing rules and limitations is used to simulate market outcomes with and without market coupling. This accounts for 1) and 2). Market coupling improves social surplus in the order of 108 €/year, unless it encourages the largest producer in the region to switch from a price-taking strategy in Belgium to a Cournot strategy due to a perceived diminishment of the threat of regulatory intervention. Benefit to Dutch consumers depends on the behavior of this company. The results illustrate how large-scale oligopoly models can be useful for assessing market integration.

[1]  Tanga McDaniel,et al.  Auctions and trading in energy markets -- an economic analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Blaise Allaz,et al.  Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency , 1993 .

[3]  Henrik Orzen,et al.  Do forward markets enhance competition?: Experimental evidence , 2006 .

[4]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 66 Competition with Forward Contracts: a Laboratory Analysis Motivated by Electricity Market Design Competition with Forward Contracts: a Laboratory Analysis Motivated by Electricity Market Design* B , 2022 .

[5]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Electricity market modeling trends , 2005 .

[6]  J. Pang,et al.  Oligopolistic Competition in Power Networks: A Conjectured Supply Function Approach , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[7]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization &Integration* , 2005 .

[8]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Economic Inefficiency of Passive Transmission Rights in Congested Electricity Systems with Competitive Generation , 1997 .

[9]  J. Pang,et al.  Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach , 2000 .

[10]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  An Empirical Study of Applied Game Theory: Transmission Constrained Cournot Behavior , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Computable Equilibrium Models and the Restructuring of the European Electricity and Gas Markets , 1997 .

[12]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system-part I: formulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details , 2005 .

[14]  Dominique Finon,et al.  Competition in European Electricity Markets: A Cross-Country Comparison , 2003 .

[15]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Spatial Oligopolistic Electricity Models with Cournot Generators and Regulated Transmission Prices , 1999, Oper. Res..

[16]  J. Tirole,et al.  Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks , 1999 .

[17]  A.F. Wals,et al.  Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system-part II: application , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Variational Inequality Models of Restructured Electricity Systems , 2001 .

[19]  Jean-Michel Glachant,et al.  Competition in European Electricity Markets: A Cross-Country Comparison , 2003 .

[20]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach , 1999 .

[21]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Alternative Models of Restructured Electricity Systems, Part 1: No Market Power , 2001, Oper. Res..

[22]  K. Neuhoff Integrating Transmission and Energy Markets Mitigates Market Power , 2003 .

[23]  Richard Green,et al.  The Electricity Contract Market in England and Wales , 2003 .

[24]  James Bushnell,et al.  Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation , 2004 .

[25]  W. Hogan Contract networks for electric power transmission , 1992 .

[26]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Towards a Common European Electricity Market , 2002 .

[27]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[28]  M. Ferris,et al.  The Path Solver : A Non-Monotone StabilizationScheme for Mixed Complementarity , 1995 .

[29]  H. Haubrich,et al.  Analysis of Electricity Network Capacities and Identification of Congestion , 2002 .

[30]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Modeling strategic generator behavior with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system: formulation and application , 2004 .

[31]  J. Cardell Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks , 1997 .

[32]  Richard W. Cottle,et al.  Linear Complementarity Problem. , 1992 .

[33]  F. Schweppe Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[34]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Chapter 3 Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Modeling for Electric Power Markets , 2003 .

[35]  Rudi A. Hakvoort,et al.  Congestion Management in the European Electricity System: An Evaluation of the Alternatives , 2001 .

[36]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Nash-Cournot Equilibria in Power Markets on a Linearized DC Network with Arbitrage: Formulations and Properties , 2003 .

[37]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga CROSS-BORDER TARIFICATION IN THE INTERNAL ELECTRICITY MARKET OF THE EUROPEAN UNION , 2002 .

[38]  F. Barale WHY DOES AN EFFICIENT ELECTRICITY MARKET REQUIRE COORDINATION MECHANISMS BETWEEN POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBU- TION AND SUPPLY ACTIVITIES? , 2003 .

[39]  CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY PRICES AND FORWARD MARKET HEDGING , 2000 .