Peer support in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial in primary care with parallel economic and qualitative analyses: pilot study and protocol

BackgroundDiabetes is a chronic illness, which requires the individual to assume responsibility for their own care with the aim of maintaining glucose and blood pressure levels as close to normal as possible. Traditionally self-management training for diabetes has been delivered in a didactic manner. In recent times alternatives to the traditional delivery of diabetes care have been investigated, for example, the concept of peer support which emphasises patient rather than professional domination. This paper describes the pilot study and protocol for a study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer support intervention for people with type 2 diabetes in a primary care setting.Methods/DesignA pilot study was conducted to access the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of a peer support intervention. We used the MRC Framework for the evaluation of complex interventions. Elements of the intervention were defined and the study protocol was finalized. In this cluster randomised controlled trial twenty general practices are assigned to control and intervention groups. Each practice compiles a diabetes register and randomly selects 21 patients. All practices implement a standardised diabetes care system. In the intervention group all practices recruit three peer supporters. The peer supporters are trained to conduct nine group meetings in their general practice over a period of two years. Each meeting has a structured component. The primary outcomes are blood pressure, total cholesterol, HBA1c and the Diabetes Well-being score. In addition to biophysical, psychosocial, economic and health service utilization data peer supporter activity and qualitative data are collected.DiscussionPeer support is a complex intervention and evaluating such an intervention presents challenges to researchers. This study will evaluate whether a peer support programme for patients with type 2 diabetes improves biophysical and psychosocial outcomes and whether it is an acceptable, cost effective intervention in the primary care setting.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN42541690

[1]  S. Smith Randomised controlled trials in Irish general practice. , 2004, Irish medical journal.

[2]  Y. Jang,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2010 by the American Diabetes Association: Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease , 2010 .

[3]  D. Mant,et al.  REPORTING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS WITH NONSIGNIFICANT EFFECT DIFFERENCES: EXAMPLE FROM A TRIAL OF SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  N. Parent,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of vicarious experience through peer support for male first-time cardiac surgery patients: impact on anxiety, self-efficacy expectation, and self-reported activity. , 2000, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[5]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[6]  H Roberts,et al.  Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  S. Wilson Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[8]  L. Robins,et al.  How Do We Know? Reflections on qualitative research in diabetes , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Ann Louise Kinmonth,et al.  General practice Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice : impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk , 1998 .

[10]  I. Holloway A-Z of qualitative research in healthcare , 2008 .

[11]  大徳 真珠子 糖尿病患者のフットケア行動に対する看護介入の検討 : セルフケア行動評価尺度J-SDSCA(Japanese Translated "The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure")を用いて , 2006 .

[12]  Clare Bradley,et al.  Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes : A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice , 1994 .

[13]  William L. Miller,et al.  Primary Care Research: A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Roadmap , 1992 .

[14]  P. Gard A behavioural approach to pharmacy practice , 2000 .

[15]  S. Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes , 2004, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Staines,et al.  A qualitative investigation of the views and health beliefs of patients with Type 2 diabetes following the introduction of a diabetes shared care service , 2003, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[17]  A. Costello,et al.  Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[18]  H. Hearnshaw,et al.  Complex intervention development for diabetes self-management. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  K. Rook,et al.  Social Support Measurement and Interventions , 2000 .

[20]  T. Kangas [On the management of diabetes]. , 1968, Sairaanhoitaja. Sjukskoterskan.

[21]  S. Oliver,et al.  Using Research For Effective Health Promotion , 2001 .

[22]  S. Norris,et al.  Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[23]  J. House,et al.  Social relationships and health. , 1988, Science.

[24]  A. Oakley,et al.  A listening trial : 'qualitative' methods within experimental research. , 2001 .

[25]  Oluf Pedersen,et al.  Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Richard Smith New BMJ policy on economic evaluations , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  N. Clark,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes: Response to Power , 2006 .

[28]  S. Rollnick,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve the care given in general practice to Type II diabetic patients: patient outcomes and professional ability to change behaviour. , 1998, Family practice.

[29]  V. Helgeson,et al.  Social support and adjustment to cancer: reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[30]  A. Morrow,et al.  Influencing birth outcomes in Nepal , 2004, The Lancet.

[31]  P. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Community mothers' programme: extension to the travelling community in Ireland. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[32]  M Hørder,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  S. Griffin,et al.  Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  Margaret E Cupples,et al.  Development of a complex intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care using the UK Medical Research Council framework. , 2006, The American journal of managed care.

[35]  S. Griffin,et al.  Systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes mellitus. , 2001, Nursing times.

[36]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 , 1998, BMJ.

[37]  Barbara Resnick,et al.  A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[38]  M. Courtney,et al.  Validation of the Australian/English version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale. , 2005, International journal of nursing practice.

[39]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The Chronic Illness Resources Survey: cross-validation and sensitivity to intervention. , 2005, Health education research.

[40]  A. O'Connor The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[41]  A. Staines,et al.  The North Dublin randomized controlled trial of structured diabetes shared care. , 2004, Family practice.

[42]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Treatment allocation by minimisation , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  C. Dennis,et al.  Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. , 2003, International journal of nursing studies.

[44]  Barbara Resnick,et al.  Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[45]  M. Zwarenstein,et al.  Lay health workers in primary and community health care. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.