Comparability of mobility particle sizers and diffusion chargers

Abstract A large study on the comparability of various aerosol instruments was conducted. The study involved altogether 24 instruments, including eleven scanning, sequential and fast mobility particle sizers (five Grimm SMPS+C, three TSI SMPS and three FMPS) with different settings and differential mobility analyzers (DMAs), twelve instruments based on unipolar diffusion charging to determine size integrated concentrations and in some cases mean particle size (five miniDiSCs of the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, four Philips Aerasense nanoTracers, two TSI Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitors and one Grimm nanoCheck) and one TSI ultrafine condensation particle counter (UCPC). All instruments were simultaneously challenged with particles of various sizes, concentrations and morphologies. All measurement results were compared with those from a freshly calibrated SMPS for size distributions and the UCPC for number concentration. In general, all SMPSs showed good comparability with particularly the sizing agreeing to within a few percent. Differences in the determined number concentration were somewhat more pronounced, but the largest deviations could be tracked back to the use of an older software version. The comparability of the FMPSs was shown to be lower, with discrepancies on the order of ±25% for sizing and ±30% for total concentrations. The discrepancies between FMPSs and the internal reference SMPS seemed to be influenced by particle size and morphology. Total number and/or lung deposited surface area concentrations measured with unipolar diffusion charger based instruments generally agreed to within ±30% with the internal references (CPC for number concentrations; lung deposited surface area derived from SMPS measurements), as long as the particle size distributions of the test aerosols were within the specified limits for the instruments. When the upper size limit was exceeded, deviations of up to several hundred percent were detected.

[1]  S. Kaufman,et al.  A new corona-based charger for aerosol particles , 2000 .

[2]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Towards traceable particle number concentration standard: Single charged aerosol reference (SCAR) , 2010 .

[3]  H. Fissan,et al.  Calibration and numerical simulation of Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (TSI Model 3550 NSAM) , 2006 .

[4]  G. Mulholland,et al.  Re-evaluation of the slip correction parameter of certified PSL spheres using a nanometer differential mobility analyzer (NDMA) , 2012 .

[5]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[6]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier , 2011 .

[7]  W. A. Hoppel.  Determination of the aerosol size distribution from the mobility distribution of the charged fraction of aerosols , 1978 .

[8]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  O. Witschger,et al.  Evaluation of the diffusion size classifier (meDiSC) for the real-time measurement of particle size and number concentration of nanoaerosols in the range 20-700 nm. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[10]  G. Kasper,et al.  Bipolar diffusion charging of fibrous aerosol particles. I: Charging theory , 1984 .

[11]  T. Kuhlbusch.  Diurnal variations of aerosol characteristics at a rural measuring site close to the Ruhr-Area, Germany , 2001 .

[12]  Günter Oberdörster,et al.  Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in vivo studies , 2000 .

[13]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[14]  H. Fissan,et al.  Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area , 2006 .

[15]  Kaarle Hämeri,et al.  Comparison of nanoparticle measurement instruments for occupational health applications , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[16]  Anshuman A. Lall,et al.  On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis: I. Theoretical analysis , 2006 .

[17]  A. Wiedensohler,et al.  An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range , 1988 .

[18]  S. Friedlander,et al.  On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis: II. Comparison of measurements and theory , 2006 .

[19]  Dirk Dahmann,et al.  Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[20]  N. Fuchs,et al.  On the stationary charge distribution on aerosol particles in a bipolar ionic atmosphere , 1963 .

[21]  David M. Brown,et al.  The Importance of Surface Area and Specific Reactivity in the Acute Pulmonary Inflammatory Response to Particles , 2002 .

[22]  E. Cunningham.  On the Velocity of Steady Fall of Spherical Particles through Fluid Medium , 1910 .

[23]  Matthias Voetz,et al.  Monitor for detecting and assessing exposure to airborne nanoparticles , 2010 .

[24]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  A submicron aerosol standard and the primary, absolute calibration of the condensation nuclei counter , 1974 .

[25]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Determination of particle size distributions by means of an electrostatic classifier , 1983 .

[26]  Cheol-Heon Jeong,et al.  Inter-Comparison of a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer and a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Incorporating an Ultrafine Water-Based Condensation Particle Counter , 2009 .

[27]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Development of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Off-Line Particle Analysis , 1999 .

[28]  K. Donaldson,et al.  Inhalation of poorly soluble particles. II. Influence Of particle surface area on inflammation and clearance. , 2000, Inhalation toxicology.

[29]  Kihong Park,et al.  Comparison of four scanning mobility particle sizers at the Fresno Supersite , 2011 .

[30]  Dirk Dahmann,et al.  Comparison of four mobility particle sizers with different time resolution for stationary exposure measurements , 2009 .

[31]  B. Wehner,et al.  Particle number size distributions in a street canyon and their transformation into the urban-air background: measurements and a simple model study , 2002 .

[32]  D. Pui,et al.  A low pressure drop preseparator for elimination of particles larger than 450 nm , 2011 .

[33]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Aerosol Surface Instruments in Transition Regime , 2005 .

[34]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of ultrafine particle concentration and size distribution in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[35]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[36]  Hannes Tammet,et al.  Electrical aerosol spectrometer of Tartu University , 1998 .

[37]  Güunter Oberdürster.  Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in vivo studies , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  Delphine Bard,et al.  From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects , 2009 .

[39]  Icrp.  Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .

[40]  Kaarle Hämeri,et al.  Spatial variation of aerosol number concentration in Helsinki city , 1999 .

[41]  H. Fissan,et al.  Conceptual limitations and extensions of lung-deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM) , 2009 .

[42]  T. Kuhlbusch,et al.  Mathematical Description of Experimentally Determined Charge Distributions of a Unipolar Diffusion Charger , 2011 .

[43]  Intercomparison of mobility particle sizers (MPS) , 2001 .

[44]  David Y. H. Pui,et al.  Slip Correction Measurements of Certified PSL Nanoparticles Using a Nanometer Differential Mobility Analyzer (Nano-DMA) for Knudsen Number From 0.5 to 83 , 2005, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[45]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles , 2000, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[46]  A. Berner,et al.  A new electromobility spectrometer for the measurement of aerosol size distributions in the size range from 1 to 1000 nm , 1991 .

[47]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Total Surface Area Concentration Measurements of Nanoparticles in Gases with an Electrical Sensor , 2012 .

[48]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1989 .