Reprogramming of the human intestinal epigenome by surgical tissue transposition

Extracellular cues play critical roles in the establishment of the epigenome during development and may also contribute to epigenetic perturbations found in disease states. The direct role of the local tissue environment on the post-development human epigenome, however, remains unclear due to limitations in studies of human subjects. Here, we use an isogenic human ileal neobladder surgical model and compare global DNA methylation levels of intestinal epithelial cells pre- and post-neobladder construction using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Our study is the first to quantify the effect of environmental cues on the human epigenome and show that the local tissue environment directly modulates DNA methylation patterns in normal differentiated cells in vivo. In the neobladder, the intestinal epithelial cells lose their tissue-specific epigenetic landscape in a time-dependent manner following the tissue’s exposure to a bladder environment. We find that de novo methylation of many intestine-specific enhancers occurs at the rate of 0.41% per month (P < 0.01, Pearson = 0.71), while demethylation of primarily non-intestine-specific transcribed regions occurs at the rate of −0.37% per month (P < 0.01, Pearson = −0.57). The dynamic resetting of the DNA methylome in the neobladder not only implicates local environmental cues in the shaping and maintenance of the epigenome but also illustrates an unexpected cross-talk between the epigenome and the cellular environment.

[1]  Bastiaan T. Heijmans,et al.  From promises to practical strategies in epigenetic epidemiology , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  G. Hannon,et al.  DNA methylation dynamics during intestinal stem cell differentiation reveals enhancers driving gene expression in the villus , 2013, Genome Biology.

[3]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Epigenetic memory in the context of nuclear reprogramming and cancer , 2013, Briefings in functional genomics.

[4]  P. Laird,et al.  Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Irene Cantone,et al.  Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  Bradley E. Bernstein,et al.  Genome-wide Chromatin State Transitions Associated with Developmental and Environmental Cues , 2013, Cell.

[7]  T. Ideker,et al.  Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[8]  Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.  The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome , 2012, Nature.

[9]  P. Visscher,et al.  Neonatal DNA methylation profile in human twins is specified by a complex interplay between intrauterine environmental and genetic factors, subject to tissue-specific influence , 2012, Genome research.

[10]  J. Kere,et al.  Differential DNA Methylation in Purified Human Blood Cells: Implications for Cell Lineage and Studies on Disease Susceptibility , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer , 2012, Nature.

[12]  P. Laird,et al.  Environmental epigenetics: prospects for studying epigenetic mediation of exposure–response relationships , 2012, Human Genetics.

[13]  C. Walker,et al.  Developmental reprogramming of cancer susceptibility , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Distinct DNA methylomes of newborns and centenarians , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Peter A. Jones Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  S. Siracusano,et al.  Morphological Changes on the Intestinal Mucosa in Orthotopic Neobladder , 2012, Urologia Internationalis.

[17]  Devin C. Koestler,et al.  DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  E. Furlong,et al.  Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization , 2012, Nature Methods.

[20]  M. Fraga,et al.  Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  Allelic methylation levels of the noncoding VTRNA2-1 located on chromosome 5q31.1 predict outcome in AML. , 2012, Blood.

[22]  P. Laird,et al.  Regions of focal DNA hypermethylation and long-range hypomethylation in colorectal cancer coincide with nuclear lamina–associated domains , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Vijay K. Tiwari,et al.  DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions , 2011, Nature.

[24]  Gangning Liang,et al.  Polycomb-Repressed Genes Have Permissive Enhancers that Initiate Reprogramming , 2011, Cell.

[25]  K. Gunderson,et al.  High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. , 2011, Genomics.

[26]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome — biological and translational implications , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  D. Balding,et al.  Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  M. Esteller,et al.  Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome , 2011, Epigenetics.

[29]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  "Systematic" , 1966, Comput. J..

[30]  Timothy J. Durham,et al.  Systematic analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types , 2011, Nature.

[31]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  B. Christensen,et al.  Aging and Environmental Exposures Alter Tissue-Specific DNA Methylation Dependent upon CpG Island Context , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[33]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.

[34]  R. Jirtle,et al.  Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  A. Chess,et al.  Gene Body-Specific Methylation on the Active X Chromosome , 2007, Science.

[36]  A. Kaneda,et al.  High Levels of Aberrant DNA Methylation in Helicobacter pylori–Infected Gastric Mucosae and its Possible Association with Gastric Cancer Risk , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[37]  S. Groshen,et al.  Urethral tumor recurrence following cystectomy and urinary diversion: clinical and pathological characteristics in 768 male patients. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[38]  T. Höckenström,et al.  Biological consequences of exposing ileal mucosa to urine , 1987, World Journal of Surgery.

[39]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Microbial flora in ileal and colonic neobladders. , 2004, European urology.

[40]  A. Bird DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. , 2002, Genes & development.

[41]  S. Ferretti,et al.  Histological Adaptation of Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder Mucosa: 4-Year Follow-Up of 30 Patients , 1999, European Urology.

[42]  P. Jones,et al.  The DNA methylation paradox. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[43]  S. Baylin,et al.  Aging and DNA methylation in colorectal mucosa and cancer. , 1998, Cancer research.

[44]  P. Bassi,et al.  Structural and ultrastructural changes in ileal neobladder mucosa: a 7-year follow-up. , 1998, British journal of urology.

[45]  S. Groshen,et al.  Urethral recurrence in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladders. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[46]  V. L. Wilson,et al.  DNA methylation decreases in aging but not in immortal cells. , 1983, Science.

[47]  J. Cordonnier Urinary diversion. , 1957, Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons.