A preliminary study on the integration of engineering and aesthetics measures via the design of vehicle silhouettes

The success of a consumer product is the result of not only engineering specifications but also emotional effects. Therefore, product design must be multidisciplinary as well as transdisciplinary across both natural and social science. In this work, we investigate the optimal design of vehicle silhouettes considering various aesthetic and engineering measures. The entire design problem is modeled as a bi-level structure with the top level being the aesthetic subproblem and the lower level consists of subproblems in the engineering discipline. This multi-level system provides a feasible approach in solving complex design problems; it also resembles the interactions of different departments in the auto industry. The aesthetic subproblem uses 11 proportionality measures and curvature to quantify a vehicle silhouette. The engineering discipline includes safety, handling, and aerodynamics of a vehicle with physical constraints on vehicle geometry. The design variables are the locations of 15 nodal points in describing the silhouette of a vehicle. The linking variables between subsystems are body and chassis dimensions that must be consistent for a design to be feasible. The optimal design of this hierarchical problem is obtained using the analytical target cascading from the literature. Results show that the original prohibitively expensive all-in-one problem becomes solvable if systems of smaller subproblems are created. Adding emotional measures in engineering design is invaluable and will reveal the true merits of a product from consumers’ point of view. Although such metrics are generally opaque, this research demonstrates the impacts of these measures once they become available.

[1]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[2]  W. J. Zhang,et al.  Integrated design of function, usability, and aesthetics for automobile interiors: State of the art, challenges, and solutions , 2006 .

[3]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Perceptual Attributes in Product Design: Fuel Economy and Silhouette-Based Perceived Environmental Friendliness Tradeoffs in Automotive Vehicle Design , 2012 .

[4]  R. Dale Wilson,et al.  How designers and buyers evaluate products , 1989 .

[5]  Nicholas S. Sapidis Designing Fair Curves and Surfaces: Shape Quality in Geometric Modeling and Computer-Aided Design , 1994, Designing Fair Curves and Surfaces.

[6]  Kiran Solanki,et al.  System reliability based vehicle design for crashworthiness and effects of various uncertainty reduction measures , 2009 .

[7]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design☆ , 1997 .

[8]  M.S.J. Hashmi,et al.  Evaluation of the aesthetics of products and integration of the findings in a proposed intelligent design system , 2004 .

[9]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[10]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[11]  Mel Yamamoto,et al.  The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products , 1994 .

[12]  H Shiizuka,et al.  Overview of the Kansei system , 2006 .

[13]  Kai-Wen Tien,et al.  Agent-based negotiation mechanism for multi-project human resource allocation , 2013 .

[14]  Helen C. Purchase,et al.  Metrics for Graph Drawing Aesthetics , 2002, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[15]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei engineering and application of the rough sets model , 2006 .

[16]  Park Hyoung-June,et al.  Hermes: a Computational Tool for Proportional Studies in Design , 2005 .

[17]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Convergence properties of analytical target cascading , 2002 .

[18]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..