Understanding the connections between relationship conflict and performance: The intervening roles of trust and exchange

Research shows that relationship conflict has a negative impact on job performance. There is scant theoretical work, however, explaining the interpersonal dynamics that lead to this outcome. A conceptual model is developed that explores how relationship conflict impacts performance through its effects on trust and exchange. We argue that relationship conflict has a detrimental effect on trust motivating coworkers to rely more on calculus-based trust than on relationship-based trust. This, in turn, affects the form of exchange coworkers use with one another, leading them to rely on negotiated exchange to the exclusion of reciprocal exchange. This kind of exchange relationship, finally, affects in-role, extra-role, and attitudinal outcomes. The literature shows that superordinate goals can mitigate relationship conflict and we use social and self-categorization theories to explain and explore this effect on both relationship conflict and trust. How trust and exchange might change over time is also explored. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Eklund,et al.  Reconceptualizing Team Identification: New Dimensions and Their Relationship to Intergroup Bias , 2005 .

[2]  Amy E. Randel Identity salience: a moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict , 2002 .

[3]  C. Dreu When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams , 2006 .

[4]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[5]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[6]  Charlotte R. Gerstner,et al.  Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues , 1997 .

[7]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[8]  Michele Williams In Whom we Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development , 2001 .

[9]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[10]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The effects of conflict on strategic decision making effectiveness and organizational performance. , 1997 .

[11]  E. Lawler An Affect Theory of Social Exchange1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[13]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[14]  James R. Brown,et al.  The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships , 2006 .

[15]  J A Wall,et al.  Conflict across organizational boundaries: managed care organizations versus health care providers. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[17]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams , 1999 .

[18]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. , 1998 .

[19]  T. Bonoma,et al.  Managing Organizational Conflict: A Model for Diagnosis and Intervention , 1979 .

[20]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[21]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[22]  E. A. Locke Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[23]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[25]  Elizabeth A. McGlynn,et al.  Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. , 2000 .

[26]  Neil Conway,et al.  Understanding Psychological Contracts at Work , 2005 .

[27]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[28]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[29]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts , 1990 .

[30]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey , 2000 .

[31]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[33]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Francis J. Flynn HOW MUCH SHOULD I GIVE AND HOW OFTEN ? THE EFFECTS OF GENEROSITY AND FREQUENCY OF FAVOR EXCHANGE ON SOCIAL STATUS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2003 .

[35]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[36]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[37]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  The highs and lows of group homogeneity , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[38]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Lisa Hope Pelled RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP CONFLICT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD INVESTIGATION , 1996 .

[40]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[41]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[42]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  M. Sherif Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[45]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[46]  W. Swann,et al.  Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[48]  Ravi Dharwadkar,et al.  Social Exchanges Within Organizations and Work Outcomes , 2004 .

[49]  Lynne J. Millward,et al.  Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job Commitment , 1998 .

[50]  P. Lynch,et al.  Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  Debra A. Major,et al.  A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF NEWCOMER EXPECTATIONS, EARLY SOCIALIZATION OUTCOMES, AND THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ROLE DEVELOPMENT FACTORS , 1995 .

[52]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[53]  Ira J. Roseman,et al.  Phenomenology, Behaviors, and Goals Differentiate Discrete Emotions , 1994 .

[54]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  Francis J. Flynn Identity Orientations And Forms Of Social Exchange In Organizations , 2005 .

[56]  Anson Seers,et al.  Team-member exchange quality: a new construct for role-making research , 1989 .

[57]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .

[58]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  The Workplace Social Exchange Network , 2002 .

[59]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[60]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support. , 1986 .

[61]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation , 1990 .

[63]  Linda D. Molm Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange* , 2003 .

[64]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior , 2002 .

[65]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Micro-OB and the Network Organization , 1996 .

[66]  Shane R. Thye,et al.  Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[68]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .