Life cycle considerations of nano-enabled agrochemicals: are today's tools up to the task?

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) used as fertilizers, pesticides and growth regulators will involve direct application of large quantities of ENMs to the environment and products intended for human consumption. Assessing their life cycle environmental impacts to mitigate unintended consequences poses several challenges. In this perspective, we identify obstacles to the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for evaluating environmental tradeoffs of nano-enabled agrochemical applications. These include: (1) defining functional units that represent the function provided by nano-enabled agrochemicals and that are proportional to the scale of the study (nano-scale vs. field scale), (2) limitations in availability of comprehensive data necessary to inform life cycle material flow (resource use and emissions) for inventory development specific to nano-enabled agrochemical applications,(3) human and environmental exposure and effects data relevant to the agricultural context for impact assessment models, (4) spatial and temporal dependent components that can affect the results of an LCA of nano-enabled agrochemicals, and (5) high data uncertainties and the possibility of their reduction through collaborative efforts between life cycle practitioners and experimental researchers using anticipatory decision-based models. While several of these challenges are experienced in LCA of emerging technologies generally, they are highlighted herein due to their unique or heightened relevance to the use of ENMs in agriculture applications. Addressing challenges in these areas are intended to inform research prioritization to ensure safe and sustainable design, development, and implementation of nano-enabled agrochemicals.

[1]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Progress in working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry , 2012 .

[2]  A. Jaberzadeh,et al.  Influence of Bulk and Nanoparticles Titanium Foliar Application on some Agronomic Traits, Seed Gluten and Starch Contents of Wheat Subjected to Water Deficit Stress , 2013 .

[3]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth and antioxidant system of chickpea seedlings , 2013 .

[4]  E. Valsami-Jones,et al.  A mesocosm study of fate and effects of CuO nanoparticles on endobenthic species (Scrobicularia plana, Hediste diversicolor). , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  R. Lawrence,et al.  How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Yang Deng,et al.  Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  T. Seager,et al.  Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Modeling nanomaterial environmental fate in aquatic systems. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Seung Hwan Yang,et al.  Environmental impacts of genetically modified plants: A review. , 2017, Environmental research.

[10]  Gregory A Keoleian,et al.  Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  J. Boer,et al.  Protein consumption and sustainability: Diet diversity in EU-15 , 2006 .

[12]  Thomas P Seager,et al.  Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Kyle W Meisterling,et al.  Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat , 2009 .

[14]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Stream dynamics and chemical transformations control the environmental fate of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles in a watershed-scale model. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Introducing Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2015 .

[16]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Nutrient density of beverages in relation to climate impact , 2010, Food & nutrition research.

[17]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Andrea L Hicks,et al.  Life Cycle Payback Estimates of Nanosilver Enabled Textiles under Different Silver Loading, Release, And Laundering Scenarios Informed by Literature Review. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  P. Zhai,et al.  Net energy benefits of carbon nanotube applications , 2016 .

[20]  A. Marvuglia,et al.  Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: Critical review and proposed framework for biogas production , 2013 .

[21]  L. Reijnders,et al.  Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices. , 2003, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  R. Halden,et al.  Comparison of Land, Water, and Energy Requirements of Lettuce Grown Using Hydroponic vs. Conventional Agricultural Methods , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[23]  Guozhong Wang,et al.  Effects of surface ligands on the uptake and transport of gold nanoparticles in rice and tomato. , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[24]  F. Yoldaş,et al.  Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield Quality and Nutrient Content in Broccoli , 2008 .

[25]  B. Frostell,et al.  Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: Potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation , 2011 .

[26]  Benjamin P Colman,et al.  Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Leanne M. Gilbertson,et al.  Atom Conversion Efficiency: A New Sustainability Metric Applied to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Use in Agriculture , 2018 .

[28]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Why Life Cycle Assessment Does Not Work for Synthetic Biology. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Thomas Kuhlbusch,et al.  Fate and Bioavailability of Engineered Nanoparticles in Soils: A Review , 2014 .

[30]  J. Aubin,et al.  Spatial differentiation in Life Cycle Assessment LCA applied to an agricultural territory: current practices and method development , 2016 .

[31]  G. Lowry,et al.  In Situ Measurement of CuO and Cu(OH)2 Nanoparticle Dissolution Rates in Quiescent Freshwater Mesocosms , 2016 .

[32]  Drew E. Latta,et al.  CuO and ZnO nanoparticles: phytotoxicity, metal speciation, and induction of oxidative stress in sand-grown wheat , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[33]  Cyren M. Rico,et al.  Cerium oxide nanoparticles impact yield and modify nutritional parameters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). , 2014, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[34]  H. Godfray,et al.  Food security and sustainable intensification , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Freshwater ecotoxicity characterisation factor for metal oxide nanoparticles: a case study on titanium dioxide nanoparticle. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  B. Giese,et al.  Risks, Release and Concentrations of Engineered Nanomaterial in the Environment , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Maria Hernandez,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Nanotechnology in Batteries for Electric Vehicles , 2017 .

[38]  G. Norris.  The requirement for congruence in normalization , 2001 .

[39]  Leila Pourzahedi,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of nanosilver-enabled bandages. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  H. Buist,et al.  Derivation of health effect factors for nanoparticles to be used in LCIA , 2017 .

[41]  A. Johnston,et al.  Phosphorus use efficiency and management in agriculture , 2015 .

[42]  J. Tarafdar,et al.  ZnO Nanoparticle Biosynthesis and Its Effect on Phosphorous-Mobilizing Enzyme Secretion and Gum Contents in Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) , 2013, Agricultural Research.

[43]  Annik Magerholm Fet,et al.  LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations , 2008 .

[44]  S. Omaye,et al.  Hydroponics: potential for augmenting sustainable food production in non-arable regions , 2016 .

[45]  D. Howard,et al.  Impact of Surface Charge on Cerium Oxide Nanoparticle Uptake and Translocation by Wheat (Triticum aestivum). , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Joe Mari Maja,et al.  Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review , 2012 .

[47]  Michael A. Gonzalez,et al.  An examination of silver nanoparticles in socks using screening-level life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[48]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Simulation tool for assessing the release and environmental distribution of nanomaterials , 2015, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[49]  Cyren M. Rico,et al.  Trophic transfer, transformation, and impact of engineered nanomaterials in terrestrial environments. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  David Rickerby.  Nanotechnology for Sustainable Manufacturing , 2014 .

[51]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: state of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[53]  A. Harris,et al.  Toxicity, Uptake, and Translocation of Engineered Nanomaterials in Vascular plants. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  Thomas L. Theis,et al.  Comparison of Life‐Cycle Inventory Databases: A Case Study Using Soybean Production , 2006 .

[55]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of nano-SiO2, nano iron oxides, nano-CeO2, nano-Al2O3, and quantum dots in seven European regions. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[56]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Development of Comparative Toxicity Potentials of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Use in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[57]  Dik van de Meent,et al.  Multimedia Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles with SimpleBox4nano: Model Definition and Evaluation , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[59]  I. Vázquez-Rowe,et al.  Applying consequential LCA to support energy policy: land use change effects of bioenergy production. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[60]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[61]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[62]  Jose R Peralta-Videa,et al.  Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. , 2011, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[63]  Jorge Gardea-Torresdey,et al.  Particle-size dependent accumulation and trophic transfer of cerium oxide through a terrestrial food chain. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[65]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  New perspectives on nanomaterial aquatic ecotoxicity: production impacts exceed direct exposure impacts for carbon nanotoubes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[66]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Time and Nanoparticle Concentration Affect the Extractability of Cu from CuO NP-Amended Soil. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  Detection, characterization, and abundance of engineered nanoparticles in complex waters by hyperspectral imagery with enhanced Darkfield microscopy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  Sarah J. McLaren,et al.  The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges , 2017 .

[69]  G. Lowry,et al.  Role of Particle Size and Soil Type in Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticles to Earthworms , 2011 .

[70]  C. A. V. van Gestel,et al.  Short-term soil bioassays may not reveal the full toxicity potential for nanomaterials; bioavailability and toxicity of silver ions (AgNO₃) and silver nanoparticles to earthworm Eisenia fetida in long-term aged soils. , 2015, Environmental pollution.

[71]  V. Karunaratne,et al.  Urea-Hydroxyapatite Nanohybrids for Slow Release of Nitrogen. , 2017, ACS nano.

[72]  Not Indicated.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Data Network - Management of UUID and version number of data sets , 2012 .

[73]  K. R. Reddy,et al.  EFFECT OF NANOSCALE ZINC OXIDE PARTICLES ON THE GERMINATION, GROWTH AND YIELD OF PEANUT , 2012 .

[74]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  Life cycle assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: Where are we? , 2018 .

[75]  Leila Pourzahedi,et al.  Life cycle energy benefits of carbon nanotubes for electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding applications , 2017 .

[76]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative , 2004 .

[77]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[78]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[79]  G. Lowry,et al.  Press or pulse exposures determine the environmental fate of cerium nanoparticles in stream mesocosms , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[80]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[81]  J. Garnier,et al.  50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland , 2014 .

[82]  Cyren M. Rico,et al.  CeO₂ and ZnO nanoparticles change the nutritional qualities of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). , 2014, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[83]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Prospective Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Nanosilver T-Shirts , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[84]  Bruce Vigon,et al.  Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases: development of training material and other implementation activities on the publication , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[85]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  Environmental occurrences, behavior, fate, and ecological effects of nanomaterials: an introduction to the special series. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[86]  Takeo Shiina,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. , 2009 .

[87]  Sydney E. Scott,et al.  Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[88]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Modeling approaches for characterizing and evaluating environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials in support of risk-based decision making. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[89]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[90]  J. Judy,et al.  Chapter One - Bioavailability, Toxicity, and Fate of Manufactured Nanomaterials in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2014 .

[91]  A. Ingle,et al.  Role of nanotechnology in agriculture with special reference to management of insect pests , 2012, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[92]  S. Pfister,et al.  A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity , 2010 .

[93]  V. Karunaratne,et al.  A green slow-release fertilizer composition based on urea-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles encapsulated wood , 2011 .

[94]  Wenchao Du,et al.  TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[95]  J. Peralta-Videa,et al.  Exposure of engineered nanomaterials to plants: Insights into the physiological and biochemical responses-A review. , 2017, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[96]  Stephen Lofts,et al.  Metal‐based nanoparticles in soil: Fate, behavior, and effects on soil invertebrates , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[97]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  Use of Monte Carlo analysis to characterize nitrogen fluxes in agroecosystems. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[98]  J. Peralta-Videa,et al.  Cerium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the nutritional value of soil cultivated soybean plants. , 2014, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[99]  David Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use , 1992 .

[100]  C. Yuan,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact of high-capacity lithium ion battery with silicon nanowires anode for electric vehicles. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[101]  Marina Maier,et al.  Introducing a localised spatio-temporal LCI method with wheat production as exploratory case study , 2017 .

[102]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 , 2011 .

[103]  H. M. G. Werf,et al.  Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment , 1996 .

[104]  E. Valsami-Jones,et al.  A marine mesocosm study on the environmental fate of silver nanoparticles and toxicity effects on two endobenthic species: the ragworm Hediste diversicolor and the bivalve mollusc Scrobicularia plana. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[105]  Jan M. Lucht,et al.  Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops , 2015, Viruses.

[106]  Jason M Unrine,et al.  Trophic transfer of Au nanoparticles from soil along a simulated terrestrial food chain. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[107]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Towards eco-efficient agriculture and food systems: theory, praxis and future challenges , 2014 .

[108]  Ahmed Busnaina,et al.  Life cycle impacts and benefits of a carbon nanotube-enabled chemical gas sensor. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[109]  F. Tubiello,et al.  Global food security under climate change , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[110]  Fern Wickson,et al.  No scientific consensus on GMO safety , 2015, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[111]  Alejandro Pérez-de-Luque.  Interaction of Nanomaterials with Plants: What Do We Need for Real Applications in Agriculture? , 2017, Front. Environ. Sci..

[112]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: a consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[113]  Mirko Miseljic,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a literature review of assessment status , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[114]  Liu Chao,et al.  Rubisco Activase mRNA Expression in Spinach: Modulation by Nanoanatase Treatment , 2008, Biological Trace Element Research.

[115]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments , 2010 .

[116]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[117]  J. Peralta-Videa,et al.  Physiological and Biochemical Changes Imposed by CeO2 Nanoparticles on Wheat: A Life Cycle Field Study. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[118]  Chao Liu,et al.  Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach , 2005, Biological Trace Element Research.

[119]  Yuan Ge,et al.  Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[120]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[121]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[122]  R. Prasad,et al.  Nanotechnology in Sustainable Agriculture: Recent Developments, Challenges, and Perspectives , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[123]  Isabel Lopes,et al.  Impact of organic and inorganic nanomaterials in the soil microbial community structure. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.