Are informed policies in place to promote safe and usable EHRs? A cross-industry comparison

Objective Despite federal policies put in place by the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) to promote safe and usable electronic health record (EHR) products, the usability of EHRs continues to frustrate providers and have patient safety implications. This study sought to compare government policies on usability and safety, and methods of examining compliance to those policies, across 3 federal agencies: the ONC and EHRs, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and avionics, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and medical devices. Our goal was to identify whether differences in policies exist and, if they do exist, how policies and enforcement mechanisms from other industries might be applied to optimize EHR usability. Method We performed a qualitative study using publicly available governing documents to examine similarities and differences in usability and safety policies across agencies. Results The policy review and analysis revealed several consistencies within each agency's usability policies. Critical differences emerged in the usability standards and policy enforcement mechanisms utilized by the 3 agencies. The FAA and FDA look at evidence of usability processes and are more prescriptive when it comes to testing final products as compared to the ONC, which relies on attestation and is less prescriptive. Discussion A comparison of usability policies across industries illustrates key differences between the ONC and other federal agencies. These differences could be contributing to the usability challenges associated with EHRs. Conclusion Our analysis highlights important areas of usability and safety policy from other industries that can better inform ONC policies on EHRs.

[1]  Richard L. Sulzer,et al.  General Aviation (FAR 23) Cockpit Standardization Analysis , 1978 .

[2]  T. H. Allegri.  The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .

[3]  M. E. Spear,et al.  Ergonomics and human factors in health care settings. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Usability - Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[5]  James E Bailey,et al.  Does health information technology dehumanize health care? , 2011, The virtual mentor : VM.

[6]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  (NISTIR 7804) Technical Evaluation, Testing and Validation of the Usability of Electronic Health Records , 2012 .

[7]  D. Chou.  Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care , 2012 .

[8]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  Measuring Regulatory Performance EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF REGULATION AND REGULATORY POLICY , 2012 .

[9]  Charlotte A. Weaver,et al.  Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[10]  Mark W Friedberg,et al.  Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and Their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy. , 2013, Rand health quarterly.

[11]  Michael W. Smith,et al.  An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Russell Marshall,et al.  Design and evaluation: end users, user datasets and personas. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Rollin J Fairbanks,et al.  Electronic Health Record Vendor Adherence to Usability Certification Requirements and Testing Standards. , 2015, JAMA.

[16]  S. Shaha,et al.  The Growing Gap in Electronic Medical Record Satisfaction Between Clinicians and Information Technology Professionals: Issues of Most Concern and Suggested Remediations. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  Avi Parush,et al.  The EHR and building the patient's story: A qualitative investigation of how EHR use obstructs a vital clinical activity , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.