The Burden of Care in Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Cleft Patients

Objectives  This study, first in Hungary, examined the success of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy in cleft patients from a caregiver's perspective and revealed factors that can cause inconvenience. Patients and Methods  A survey-based study was performed using a 32-item questionnaire following NAM therapy. The survey was sent to families whose child underwent NAM therapy from 2010 until 2020 at the 1st Department of Paediatrics, Semmelweis University. The questions focused on four main parts: socioeconomic, origin of the cleft, difficulties of therapy, and self-assessment. Fifty-three families received the questionnaire, 17 of them completed it. Results  The mean age was 5 ± 3.7 weeks when NAM therapy started. Fifty-eight percent of the patients were male and 42% female. Patients are living more than 60 km from the cleft center (59%). Patients had to make the journey between their residence and the cleft center ∼10 to 15 times. In most cases, NAM therapy was covered by health insurance (83%). The unilateral cleft and lip palate occurred 58%, while the bilateral were 42%. Thirty-five percent of the patients had an allergic reaction against the adhesive, and 35% were affected by wounds on their lips or noses. The way of feeding was variable. Seventeen percent of the parents were able to breastfeed. In all cases, parents were satisfied with the NAM therapy. Conclusions  The present study highlighted the value of caregivers' role in NAM therapy. The burden of care is acceptable, caregivers have high compliance, and are determined to help the effectiveness of therapy. Limitations of this study include a single-institute data with a small number of cases.

[1]  M. Urata,et al.  Nasoalveolar Molding: Assessing the Burden of Care. , 2021, The Journal of craniofacial surgery (Print).

[2]  Rami S. Kantar,et al.  What Is the Burden of Care of Nasoalveolar Molding? , 2020, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[3]  J. Teichgraeber,et al.  Assessing Burden of Care in the Patient With Cleft Lip and Palate: Factors Influencing Completion and Noncompletion of Nasoalveolar Molding , 2018, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[4]  B. Grayson,et al.  NasoAlveolar molding treatment protocol in patients with cleft lip and palate , 2017 .

[5]  Emily E. Hopkins,et al.  Parental experience caring for cleft lip and palate infants with nasoalveolar moulding. , 2016, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  S. Clouston,et al.  Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: A mixed method approach. , 2016, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[7]  H. Broder,et al.  Coping with Cleft: A Conceptual Framework of Caregiver Responses to Nasoalveolar Molding , 2015, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[8]  Marcie S Rubin,et al.  Comparative Study of Early Secondary Nasal Revisions and Costs in Patients With Clefts Treated With and Without Nasoalveolar Molding , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[9]  B. Grayson,et al.  Early cleft management: the case for nasoalveolar molding. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  J. V. van Aalst,et al.  Nasoalveolar Molding: Prevalence of Cleft Centers Offering NAM and who Seeks It , 2012, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  J. Meara,et al.  Timeliness of surgical care in children with special health care needs: delayed palate repair for publicly insured and minority children with cleft palate. , 2011, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[12]  Amara Abreu,et al.  Complications and Solutions in Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy , 2009, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[13]  C. Cutting,et al.  Nasoalveolar Molding Improves Long-Term Nasal Symmetry in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip–Cleft Palate Patients , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  P. Raina,et al.  Caregiving process and caregiver burden: Conceptual models to guide research and practice , 2004, BMC pediatrics.

[15]  C. Cutting,et al.  Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate , 1999 .

[16]  L. Brander 24th NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PLASTIC SURGEONS OF INDIA , 1989 .

[17]  R. Kusy,et al.  An extraorally activated expansion appliance for cleft palate infants. , 1976, The Cleft palate journal.

[18]  C. K. McNeil Congenital cleft palate; a case of congenital cleft palate which required the fitting of a special appliance. , 1948, British Dental Journal.