Positron emission tomographic assessment of ”metabolic flare” to predict response of metastatic breast cancer to antiestrogen therapy

Abstract. We have investigated whether increased tumor uptake of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) detected with positron emission tomography (PET) early after initiating tamoxifen therapy (”metabolic flare”) predicts a hormonally responsive breast cancer. Eleven postmenopausal women with biopsy-proved estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer were studied by PET with FDG and 16α[18F]fluoro-17β-estradiol (FES) before and 7–10 days after initiation of tamoxifen therapy. FDG and FES uptake was evaluated semiquantitatively in 21 lesions. The PET results were correlated with follow-up evaluation, continued until the patient became unresponsive to hormone therapy (3–24 months). There were seven responders and four nonresponders based on clinical follow-up. None of the responders had a clinical flare reaction, but all demonstrated metabolic flare, with a mean ± standard deviation increase in tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) for FDG of 1.4±0.7. No evidence for flare was noted in the nonresponders (change in SUV for FDG –0.1±0.4; P = 0.008 vs. responders). The degree of ER blockade by tamoxifen was greater in responders (mean decrease in SUV 2.7±1.7) than in nonresponders (mean decrease 0.8±0.5) (P = 0.04). The lesions of responders had higher baseline SUVs for FES than did those of three of four nonresponders (≥2.2 vs ≤1.7). The findings of a metabolic flare by FDG-PET and the degree of ER blockade by FES-PET early after institution of tamoxifen treatment appear to predict responsiveness to antiestrogen therapy in patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer.

[1]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  D. Hayes,et al.  Worsening bone scan in the evaluation of antitumor response during hormonal therapy of breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Ligand-modulated regulation of progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in human breast cancer cell lines. , 1988, Molecular endocrinology.

[4]  C. Osborne,et al.  Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A Howell,et al.  Anastrozole, a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor, versus megestrol acetate in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of overview analysis of two phase III trials. Arimidex Study Group. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Mintun,et al.  Breast cancer: PET imaging of estrogen receptors. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  P. Rosen,et al.  Tamoxifen flare in advanced breast cancer. , 1978, JAMA.

[8]  B. Furr,et al.  The pharmacology and clinical uses of tamoxifen. , 1984, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[9]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron Tomographic Assessment of 16α-[18F] Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Uptake in Metastatic Breast Carcinoma , 1991 .